<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Just to get this on the record: there is no formal proposal,
correct. However, there are many proposals and issues that are as
yet unresolved which will price an otherwise unregulated service out
of the marketplace. There is indeed a minority report that
recommends restricting P/P services to those who do not/will not use
a domain for financial transactions. That is an impressive
restriction on the ability to use privacy proxy services. <br>
Cheers SP<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2015-07-30 11:47, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+aOHUTbAoF89HFnAH+6n_kRHUzhtJznKK-zFADnbSEwWLTckw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Nobody has to publish
their confidential information to the world in order to
register a domain name. Privacy/proxy services are readily
available and there is no formal proposal to take that away
from anyone. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>