<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>No,</div><div> </div><div>we don't.</div><div><br></div><div>In terms of the Charter need to determine whether we have Full Consensus, Consensus or enough objections to constitut No Consensus of the members appointed by the chartering AC/SOs. </div><div><br></div><div>The participants do not take part in this determination and/or any related polls.</div><div><br></div><div>Qualifying language has the restrictive effect of excluding what is not mentioned. Hence I will only accept an unqualified requirement. </div><div><br></div><div>This can go into WS2 but we then loose leverage.</div><div><br></div><div>el</div><div><br></div><div> <br>-- <span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); "></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13pt; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.294118); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.231373);">Sent from </span><span style="font-size: 13pt;">Dr Lisse's iPhone 6</span></div><div><br></div></div><div><br>On Jul 30, 2015, at 23:59, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>Dear All</span><br><span>Grec ,s proposal got 11 in favour and 8 against( those voted for Keith, s proposal)</span><br><span>Keith,s proposal got 8 in favour and 11 against( those voted for Grec, s proposal)</span><br><span>My proposal got 8 in favour and 4 against</span><br><span>We thus need to identify the proposal that gained a more clear majority</span><br><span>Kavouss </span><br><span></span><br><span></span><br><span>Sent from my iPhone</span><br><span></span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>On 31 Jul 2015, at 07:37, Jonathan Zuck <<a href="mailto:JZuck@actonline.org">JZuck@actonline.org</a>> wrote:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Good question! The waters got muddy at the end. I appears as though there was a simple majority in favor of something being in there and, given that, a simple majority in favor of Greg's language. I don't know what that means for the draft that will go out to the public. There was talk of another poll on the listserv to capture more folks.</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>80% sure you don't need to draft anything and Greg will need to draft an inline objection on behalf of part of the CSG....but who knows?</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Jonathan Zuck</span></blockquote></div></blockquote><br><div>[...]</div></body></html>