<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>There was one additional dissenting opinion filed for Section 3A, updated in the attached. </div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 10:06 PM<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span> Jordan Carter <<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span> Accountability Cross Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Community Mechanism for Freeze<br></div><div><br></div><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>Dear all, </div><div><br></div><div>Here is the updated text with dissenting opinions added into the main text as opposed to footnotes. </div><div><br></div><div>Best, </div><div>Grace</div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Jordan Carter <<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 10:00 PM<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Robin Gross <<a href="mailto:robin@ipjustice.org">robin@ipjustice.org</a>>, Accountability Cross Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Community Mechanism for Freeze<br></div><div><br></div><div><div>All good to change / update as suggested
<div><br></div><div>J <span></span><br><br>
On Sunday, 2 August 2015, Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Hi Robin,</div><div><br></div><div>There was another dissenting opinion in the Community Powers section that was in a footnote. I was simply following a formatting consistency. I will confirm with the Chairs, but I don't think it'll be an issue to move the dissenting opinions in Powers
and Mechanism to the main body of the text. Those are the only sections with dissenting opinions. </div><div><br></div><div>Please hold for a confirmation from the Chairs and I will update the draft. </div><div><br></div><div>Thank you, </div><div>Grace</div><div><br>
Sent from my mobile device</div><div><br>
On Aug 1, 2015, at 21:12, Robin Gross <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','robin@ipjustice.org');" target="_blank">robin@ipjustice.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Why did the dissenting views on 5A get moved to a footnote? They were in the body of the text of the report in the versions of this document before. Had they been in a footnote before I would have objected. I don't believe it is appropriate to make
such a significant change prejudicing minority views after the document is supposedly locked. We were told the document was locked, and yet this change was made with no opportunity to object. Therefore I object now and request the text get moved back to
the body of the report as it was in all the previous drafts we reviewed.
<div><br></div><div>Thank you,</div><div>Robin<br><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 1, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><div>Dear all, </div><div><br></div><div>Here is the updated community mechanism document for the freeze. This includes the dissenting opinions text that Robin and Greg clarified. </div><div><br></div><div>Best, </div><div>Grace</div></div><span><Community Mechanism_0108.docx></span><span><Community Mechanism_0108_redline.docx></span><span><Community Mechanism_0108_redline.pdf></span><span><Community Mechanism_0108.pdf></span>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org');" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br><br>
-- <br>
Jordan Carter<br>
Chief Executive, InternetNZ
<p>+64-21-442-649 | <a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a></p><p>Sent on the run, apologies for brevity<br></p><p></p></div></div></span></div></div></span></body></html>