<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear All,</div><div>It is simple ,please replace the word" approve by " Reject " .</div><div>Tks</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-08-13 11:27 GMT+02:00 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Sabine.Meyer@bmwi.bund.de" target="_blank">Sabine.Meyer@bmwi.bund.de</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="DE" vlink="purple" link="blue">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="14f266432a683214__MailEndCompose"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Dear Julie, Martin, Greg, León,<u></u><u></u></span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Dear all,
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="-ms-layout-grid-mode: char; -ms-text-autospace:;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">I have a further question about the matrix kindly shared by León, regarding its section on PTI
Governance, specifically Section 1 subsection (a) (ii), i.e. “ jurisdiction of incorporation (i.e., to change from California to another jurisdiction)“.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="-ms-layout-grid-mode: char; -ms-text-autospace:;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Have the deliberations of the CCWG whether or not a bylaw requirement regarding location of headquarters should be a Fundamental Bylaw (para 241
– 255 of the draft report) been taken into account by the CWG? As I understand, the matrix refers to changes in the ICANN bylaws so I was wondering whether it is fully consistent with the CCWG proposal in this regard.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Best regards<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Sabine Meyer<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">International Digital and Postal Policy, Internet Governance<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Villemombler Strasse 76, 53123 Bonn<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">GERMANY<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Phone: <a href="tel:%2B49%20228%2099615-2948" target="_blank" value="+49228996152948">+49 228 99615-2948</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Fax: <a href="tel:%2B%2049%20228%2099615-2964" target="_blank" value="+49228996152964">+ 49 228 99615-2964</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">E-Mail:
</span><a href="mailto:sabine.meyer@bmwi.bund.de" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">sabine.meyer@bmwi.bund.de</span></a><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Internet:
</span><a href="http://www.bmwi.de/" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">http://www.bmwi.de</span></a><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(181,196,223) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">Von:</span></b><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>Im Auftrag von </b>Martin Boyle<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 19:09<br>
<b>An:</b> Greg Shatan; Julie Hammer<span><br>
<b>Cc:</b> At-Large Staff; <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>; Accountability Cross Community<br>
</span><b>Betreff:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] [client com] ICANN Bylaws Matrix<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Not sure why, but I did not see Julie’s original mail.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">I agree with her point. There are also other parts of this section of the matrix that raise questions for me:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p>
<u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><span><span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal">
</span>i.<span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal"> </span></span></span><u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">For all of “2. <b>ICANN Budget and IANA Budget</b>” I think CWG should
be consulted where it comes to the IANA budget.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p>
<u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><span><span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal">
</span>ii.<span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal"> </span></span></span><u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">(a) This is definitely something that needs to be considered by the
CWG. I’m not sure about what we mean by “approved budget.” In my mind, PTI prepares its budget in discussion with the OCs so there will be a general expectation that the budget is a community-agreed budget – if it isn’t, there would be reason for the budget
to be challenged. So couldn’t/shouldn’t ICANN challenge the budget if there were opposition from the community? I like the idea of a contract commitment (but wouldn’t that undermine a community power in ICANN to veto the IANA budget?) subject to there being
a condition in the contract for PTI to develop its budget in consultation with the OCs (the CSC?), given that runaway budgets in the PTI will have a knock-on effect on how much they have to pay to ICANN!<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p>
<u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><span><span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal">
</span>iii.<span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal"> </span></span></span><u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">I like the contract-condition approach because the same conditions
would need to be transferred to any new operator.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p>
<u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><span><span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal">
</span>iv.<span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal"> </span></span></span><u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">(b) Shouldn’t this be a requirement on the PTI? They are the ones
with the budget and the obligations that go with it. This would seem to be a contract condition.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p>
<u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><span><span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal">
</span>v.<span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal"> </span></span></span><u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">(c) Again a contract condition?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p>
<u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><span><span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal">
</span>vi.<span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal"> </span></span></span><u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">As I noted above, I agree with Julie. “Approval” should be part of
PTI’s budget development (especially for things like new investment, enhancing service level expectations, new technology developments).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">The CSC is an entity associated with the PTI: Is the framework under 5 better included in the contract than in a fundamental bylaw? On the other
hand, there will be operational issues and decisions that would fall under the purview of the ccNSO and GNSO (selection of members, recall of members, escalation for example) and these will probably need bylaw changes for the ccNSO and GNSO. would these need
to be fundamental bylaws, though?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Under 6, isn’t this something for the PTI, not ICANN? I guess it could be a condition in the ICANN-PTI contract that the PTI develops a problem-resolution
service, but I wonder how a bylaw in ICANN would achieve this.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">8.(e) talks about separation of PTI, but isn’t it the IANA functions operation that is separated from PTI? And if that happens, there is no reason
to do other than wind PTI up as its assets are transferred to the new operator.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(181,196,223) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">
<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Greg Shatan<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 12 August 2015 13:14<br>
<b>To:</b> Julie Hammer<br>
<b>Cc:</b> At-Large Staff; <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>; Accountability Cross Community<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] [client com] ICANN Bylaws Matrix<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Julie,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">I think you're right. As this was passed on to the whole CWG and CCWG without any prior review by any subcommittees, it should be considered subject to review and comment.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Greg Shatan<br>
<br>
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015, Julie Hammer <<a href="mailto:julie.hammer@bigpond.com" target="_blank">julie.hammer@bigpond.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Hi Leon,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Many thanks for sharing this matrix. One thing that struck me when having a quick look through it was that Sidley have listed at Item 2 (d) the following as Subject Matter for a new Fundamental Bylaw:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.5pt">"Requirement that the ICANN community
<span style="color:rgb(255,38,0)">approve </span>or veto the IANA Budget after it has been approved by the ICANN Board but before it has come into effect." </span><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">In my understanding, the proposed power was to consider and reject (or veto) the IANA Budget, but there should be no requirement for the ICANN Community to come together and actually
<span style="color:rgb(255,38,0)">approve</span> the IANA budget. I had not thought that the Community Mechanism was intended to be used for such a purpose (ie approving strategic plans, operating plans or budgets).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">I believe the relevant paragraph from the CCWG 2nd draft report is para 381 on page 58:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="margin-left:36pt"><u></u><span lang="EN-GB"><span>379.<span style="font:7pt/normal "Times New Roman";font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal">
</span></span></span><u></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:8pt">381 </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11pt">Accordingly, this new power would give the community the ability to consider strategic and operating plans and budgets (both ICANN
general and, separately, with respect to the budget for the IANA Functions) after they are approved by the Board (but before they come into effect) and reject them. The rejection could be of the proposed ICANN Budget or the IANA Budget, or of a proposed ICANN-wide
strategic or operating plan. The petition would state which Budget or plan was being subject to veto. A separate petition is required for each Budget or plan being challenged. </span><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Perhaps I am misunderstanding something, but I don’t think the word ‘approve’ should appear in 2 (d) in the Sidley matrix.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Cheers, Julie<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">On 12 Aug 2015, at 1:56 am, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <<a>leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Hi all,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">I am forwarding this matrix that the CWG is working on as it is of the interest of this group as well and to help us continue shaping our work forward.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The matrix is intended to help identify those bylaws that, from the scope of the CWG, would need to be considered fundamental. This, of course, is independent from the work we need to do but provides an example on what
we can begin crafting ourselves.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">If you want to keep being in the matrix, swallow the blue pill. If you want to work on shaping the matrix, swallow the red pill. (geek joke)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Best regards,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">León<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Inicio del mensaje reenviado:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">De:
</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">"Flanagan, Sharon" <<a>sflanagan@sidley.com</a>></span><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">Asunto: [client com] ICANN Bylaws Matrix</span></b><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">Fecha:
</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">11 de agosto de 2015 9:43:05 GMT-5</span><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">Para:
</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">Client Committee <<a>cwg-client@icann.org</a>></span><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Dear All,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Attached is a draft matrix summarizing the proposed ICANN bylaw changes that relate to CWG’s final proposal. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Could you please forward to the CWG?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Thanks<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">SHARON</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"> <b>FLANAGAN</b></span><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Partner</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">Sidley Austin LLP<br>
</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">555 California Street<br>
Suite 2000<br>
San Francisco, CA 94104<br>
<a href="tel:%2B1.415.772.1271" target="_blank" value="+14157721271">+1.415.772.1271</a></span><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><a title="Click to send email to Flanagan, Sharon"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">sflanagan@sidley.com</span></a></span><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><a title="www.sidley.com" href="http://www.sidley.com/" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">www.sidley.com</span></a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p style="word-spacing:0px"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">****************************************************************************************************<br>
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.<br>
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us<br>
immediately.<br>
<br>
****************************************************************************************************<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><209588099_1.pdf><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">_______________________________________________<br>
Cwg-client mailing list<br>
</span><span lang="EN-GB"><a><span style="color:purple;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Cwg-client@icann.org</span></a></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><br>
</span><span lang="EN-GB"><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client</span></a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a>Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>