<div dir="ltr">Chris asks...<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 25 September 2015 at 12:34, Chris Disspain <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au" target="_blank">ceo@auda.org.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><span style="font-family:'Verdana';font-size:13px;color:rgb(102,102,102)">Thanks Thomas.<div><br></div><div><span class=""><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="auto"><div>But, let's not forget that decisions will not be made by the Community or the Single Member, but by the Board. The community powers are limited to asking the Board to redo decisions (with the exception of changes of Fundamental Bylaws that need approval). The new decision is still to be made by the Board. If Board members are of the opinion that the Community asks them to do illegal things or things that might expose them to liability or just things that are fundamentally wrong, I am sure the Board member would not be available for that. </div></div></blockquote></span><div><div dir="auto"><div><br></div><div>And then what?</div></div></div><div>
<p style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica;min-height:14px;color:rgb(0,0,0);letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><br></p></div></div></span></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, presumably, that's that. The community would find that any other director it tried to appoint would find the same constraints, right? And if the issue isn't a clear cut one which, I suppose, often they aren't, they could appoint directors with a different view.</div><div><br></div><div>And then life goes on....</div><div><br></div><div>J</div><div> </div></div>
</div></div>