<p dir="ltr">Generally speaking, IMHO, the co-chairs and all participating CCWG have done a magnificent job so far in the face of the complexities and difficulties.<br>
My comment should not be read as comment on any one meeting.<br>
I was not there.<br>
RD</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sep 28, 2015 9:12 AM, "Nigel Roberts" <<a href="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net">nigel@channelisles.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I resent the below, as I perceive it as insultingly and smugly ironic.<br>
<br>
Mr Daniel does not appear to have been at the same meeting I was at, which, whilst I would not seek to disparage either side in the battle lines which have, apparently now been drawn, can, I feel be described as nothing less than a failure.<br>
<br>
If that is a magnificent job, I'd hate to see a workmanlike one.<br>
<br>
On 28/09/15 01:38, Rudolph Daniel wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
And a chance to justify a multistakeholder pat on the back for doing a<br>
magnificent job so far in the global public interest. ;)<br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</blockquote></div>