<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Avri</div><div>As long as we publish the third proposal contains a compromise between CMSM and MEM as modified by my preliminary suggestion( after refinement) I have no problem with your proposal. What I have difficulty with is the intolerable and conservative position of some colleagues that do not wish to take onto account the Board,s proposal.</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div><div><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 28 Sep 2015, at 03:34, avri doria <<a href="mailto:avri@ella.com">avri@ella.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>I think slice and dice on the proposal would lose its internal coherence as a proposal. If we change anything substantive, I think the entire thing needs to go out for review.</div><div><br></div><div>I know I just agreed to a 'moratorium,' but I don't want to leave ideas sitting long enough for them to be called 'agreed upon.'</div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:75%">avri</div><div style="font-size:75%"><br></div><div style="font-size:75%">Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device</div><br><br><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bruce Tonkin <<a href="mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au">Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au</a>> </div><div>Date:09/27/2015 7:49 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a> </div><div>Cc: </div><div>Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] The Road to Dublin.... </div><div><br></div>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Hello Becky,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D">>> </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">I agree but we need to keep in mind that the CCWG cannot speak unilaterally for the community. To the extent we move off the (substantial)
portion of the draft proposal that has consensus support, and to the extent we introduce new solutions in those areas where consensus may not be fully formed, we must go back to the community. The Board needs to understand and respect that.</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Thanks – we have also discussed this and agree.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">One approach I guess could be to put out specific sections that have substantial updates for comment.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Bruce Tonkin</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>