<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Mathieu</div><div>Pls carefully read my earlier message ,</div><div>I hope you are not acting like your co-chair not listening to the participants</div><div>I AM STRONGLY AGAINST CREATING A SMALL CLOSED GROUP to discuss any issue what so ever.</div><div>The CCWG Chater is quite clear. The community has given a rtasks to us to discuss openly freely and transparently.</div><div>THE CHARTER THEREFORE DOES NOT SPEAK OF ANY CLOSED GROUP.</div><div>If the CCWG and not Co-chair reach at a consensus that another group shouléd be formed to discuss the issue Under consideration with a view to find a way forward ,taking into account all inputs ( ccwg second Prooposal , Public Comments, Board,s proposal and the report of LA meeting) that groupm MUST BE OPEN TO EVERY BODY AND WE SHOULD AGREE ON ITS CHAIR OR CO-CHAIR.</div><div>tHE ICANN process MUST BE OPEN, INCLUSSIVE, TRANSPARENT AND DEMOCRATIC.</div><div>Pls kindly be careful and advoid creating a hiden/ closed cgroup </div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-09-29 11:50 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Weill <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear Robin,<br>
<br>
Thank you for your quick feedback. I try to clarify below.<span><br>
<br>
Le 29/09/2015 00:10, Robin Gross a écrit :<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
Thanks, Mathieu, for this helpful proposal. I've got a couple questions for clarifications about some statements on the slides.<br>
<br>
1. On slide 7, the last one, on point 2 it says "Ensure that Board briefings on CCWG are (also) provided by CCWG co-chairs". Does this mean those briefings will be provided to CCWG members via the co-chairs? Or was the "by" meant to be a "to" in that statement (or something else)? It wasn't quite clear to me.<br>
</blockquote></span>
This sentence is probably confusing. It might be expressed more clearly in the correspondence to Steve Crocker :<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
3. At the same time, we reiterate our proposal to provide, as co-chairs, regular Board briefings during the Board meetings dedicated to Accountability, alongside the briefings provided by the President and staff. We would also welcome the opportunity to review the briefing materials received by Board members, and would understand if that was subject to a non disclosure agreement. <br>
</blockquote>
So it was related to the briefings *of* the Board *by* CCWG.<br>
<br>
I hope this clarifies ?<span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
<br>
2. Also on slide 7, point 4 on the substantive work of the sub-teams (sub-part 2) "coordination by new small group (SO/AC reps, Board, Lawyers) to limit friction, no decision-making". Presumably this means the SO/AC reps appointed to CCWG. But which "board" members and which "lawyers" are proposed to coordinate the sub-teams in this new small group?<br>
</blockquote></span>
That is a good topic for discussion. At this point, this had been drawn from Ira Magaziner's suggestion to coordinate more closely within the leadership of the various groups.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Mathieu<span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
Thanks much!<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Robin<br>
<br>
On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Mathieu Weill wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
Dear Colleagues,<br>
<br>
In anticipation of a discussion during our meeting tomorrow, please find attached a set of slides to suggest a way forward, for the group's consideration.<br>
<br>
Thank you for your feedbacks.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Thomas, Leon & Mathieu<br>
<To Dublin and beyond.pdf>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br></span><span class="im HOEnZb">
-- <br>
*****************************<br>
Mathieu WEILL<br>
AFNIC - directeur général<br>
Tél: <a href="tel:%2B33%201%2039%2030%2083%2006" target="_blank" value="+33139308306">+33 1 39 30 83 06</a><br>
<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a><br>
Twitter : @mathieuweill<br>
*****************************<br>
<br></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>