<div dir="ltr">Can I just clarify something here: asking for additional documents and advice that Board has received which relate to CCWG work does not one bit suggests that we are implying power grab. I find it quite outrageous that a simple request for some information that may be or may not be available leads to such wrong misinterpretation. <div><br></div><div>Bruce, Thank you. Your assurance that the documents will be provided to the possible extent was what I needed. It's a part of informational justice. And thank you for being so responsive throughout. </div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 1 October 2015 at 10:18, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de" target="_blank">wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Seun:<br>
Overall I think we should recognise the process as a need for power Balance and not a power grab/shift<br>
<br>
Wolfgang:<br>
1++<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Farzaneh </div>
</div>