<div dir="ltr"><div>Jorge</div><div>Thank you very much that you emphasized what I said in my earlier mail as well as in LA when I raised the point that we not only need quorum for in petition process but also quorum in the number of SOs and ACs present and participating in the voting.</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-10-01 16:14 GMT+02:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na" target="_blank">el@lisse.na</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I agree in a way, though the Board is not the elected executive<br>
of the community.<br>
<br>
But my point was that an AC exercising a choice is not Capture (see<br>
the article in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture</a>)<br>
<br>
el<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On 2015-10-01 16:06, <a href="mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch">Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch</a> wrote:<br>
> The simple point is that decisions taken by the elected executive<br>
> of the community should not be able to be overturned by anything<br>
> less than a qualified majority of that community as a whole.<br>
><br>
> It's quite simple and it means that no such decisions should be<br>
> allowed with less than the support from at least 4 SO/AC.<br>
><br>
> best<br>
><br>
> Jorge<br>
><br>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet<br>
><br>
>> Am 01.10.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA>:<br>
>><br>
>> My view is that if someone chooses not to vote (s)he chooses not to<br>
>> vote. That is most certainly not capture.<br>
>><br>
>> el<br>
>><br>
>> In 2015-10-01 15:49, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:<br>
>>> Dear All,<br>
>>> Pls be so kind and think of a scenario that only two or three out<br>
>>> of 7 SOs and ACs vote then the rest not voting will be captured by<br>
>>> those two or three that voting .Even those two or three that<br>
>>> voting may not have unanimous position .<br>
>>> It is risky situation.<br>
>>> Pls read my example and analyze the outcome.<br>
>>> Regards<br>
>>> Kavouss<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)<br>
el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: <a href="tel:%2B264%2081%20124%206733" value="+264811246733">+264 81 124 6733</a> (cell)<br>
PO Box 8421 \ /<br>
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>