<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div><font>I</font><font> am </font><font>forwarding this on </font><font face="Calibri">behalf</font><font> of Jones Day, as they do not have sending rights to this list. </font> </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Note from Jones Day:</div>
<div><br style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">
<font size="2" face="sans-serif" style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Dear CCWG,</font><font size="3" face="Calibri" style="font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri;"> </font><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;"></span><font size="3" style="font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri;"><br>
</font><font size="3" face="Calibri" style="font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri;"><br>
As Holly noted in her cover email, CCWG Counsel's "Comparison of Independent Review Processes" was provided to Jones Day in advance of it being circulated to the CCWG. In the interests of transparency, please note that Jones Day did not provide line edits
identifying the areas of disagreement with CCWG Counsel, but instead provided the attached memorandum for CCWG Counsel's consideration. CCWG Counsel did not revise its Comparison document to reflect the thoughts set forth in the attached Jones Day memo. Sidley/Adler
understood that this memo would be shared with the CCWG after their Comparison document was circulated.</font><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri;"> </span></div>
<div style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of "Gregory, Holly" <<a href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 10:24 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Thomas Rickert <<a href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net">thomas@rickert.net</a>>, Mathieu Weill <<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>>, León Sánchez Ambía <<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Sidley ICANN CCWG <<a href="mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com">sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com</a>>, ACCT-Staff <<a href="mailto:acct-staff@icann.org">acct-staff@icann.org</a>>, ICANN-Adler <<a href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com">ICANN@adlercolvin.com</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[CCWG-ACCT] Comparison of independent review processes<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><!-- Template generated by Exclaimer Mail Disclaimers on 12:24:40 Thursday, 8 October 2015 --><style type="text/css">P.5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
LI.5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
DIV.5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
TABLE.5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29dTable {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</style><style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline}
span.EmailStyle17
{font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext}
.MsoChpDefault
{}
@page WordSection1
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
div.WordSection1
{}
-->
</style>
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<p class="5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d">Dear CCWG Co-chairs, Members and Participants, Attached please find a comparison of key characteristics of (1) ICANN's current IRP, (2) the IRP under the CCWG 2nd Draft Proposal (in the context of the Community
Mechanism as Sole Member Model), and (3) the IRP and MEM set forth in the Board Proposal as requested in L.A. <br>
We shared this with Jones Day and ICANN Legal in advance so that they could provide any corrections regarding our understanding of the IRP and MEM as set forth in the Board Proposal.
<br>
Kind regards, Holly and Rosemary<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Sent with Good (www.good.com)<br>
<strong></strong></p>
<strong>
<div><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"> </font></div>
</strong>
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> Grapsas, Rebecca<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 07, 2015 11:45:50 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gregory, Holly<br>
<b>Subject:</b> <br>
</font><br>
<div></div>
<div>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<p class="5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d"> </p>
<p>****************************************************************************************************<br>
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.<br>
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us<br>
immediately.<br>
<br>
****************************************************************************************************</p>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>