<html>
<head>
<!-- Template generated by Exclaimer Mail Disclaimers on 12:42:49 Thursday, 8 October 2015 -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<style type="text/css">P.5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
LI.5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
DIV.5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
TABLE.5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29dTable {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</style><style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline}
span.EmailStyle17
{font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext}
@page WordSection1
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<p class="5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d">Dear Lizanne and colleagues, <br>
Attached please find the comparison as sent to CCWG a few minutes ago. Please let us know when you would like to schedule our next call.
<br>
We remain committed to a constructive dialogue and believe that it is in the best interests of ICANN and the multi-stakeholder community that we lawyers assist in the development of consensus by seeking to resolve any disagreements regarding the legal framework
in the interests of providing clear information about the legal implications of the various options under consideration.
<br>
Kind regards, Holly and Rosemary <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Sent with Good (www.good.com)<br>
<strong></p>
<div><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"> </font></div>
</strong>
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> Gregory, Holly<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:24:40 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Thomas Rickert; Mathieu Weill; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Rosemary E. Fei; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; accountability-cross-community@icann.org; ACCT-Staff<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Comparison of independent review processes<br>
</font><br>
<div></div>
<div>Dear CCWG Co-chairs, Members and Participants, Attached please find a comparison of key characteristics of (1) ICANN's current IRP, (2) the IRP under the CCWG 2nd Draft Proposal (in the context of the Community Mechanism as Sole Member Model), and (3)
the IRP and MEM set forth in the Board Proposal as requested in L.A. <br>
We shared this with Jones Day and ICANN Legal in advance so that they could provide any corrections regarding our understanding of the IRP and MEM as set forth in the Board Proposal.
<br>
Kind regards, Holly and Rosemary<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Sent with Good (www.good.com)<br>
<strong>
<div><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"> </font></div>
</strong>
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> Grapsas, Rebecca<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 07, 2015 11:45:50 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gregory, Holly<br>
<b>Subject:</b> <br>
</font><br>
<div></div>
<div>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<p class="5aefe298-f7db-430c-afb7-8abcc411c29d"> </p>
<p>****************************************************************************************************<br>
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.<br>
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us<br>
immediately.<br>
<br>
****************************************************************************************************</p>
</body>
</html>