<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Dear Seun, all, </div><div><br></div><div>This request for a summary of where we stand is well understood, and perfectly appropriate at this point. Our plan is to provide such a quick summary before Dublin. </div><div><br></div><div>Until then, you can refer to :</div><div>- the summary we provided during last week ccwg call (available in recording or through the notes)</div><div>- the slides that I shared in my email "update from Brussels", which I used to update the centr meeting.</div><div><br></div><div>Feedback regarding our summaries is and will be welcome of course. </div><div><br></div><div>Many thanks to those, especially Avri, who provided detailed inputs to that request as well. </div><div><br></div><div>Best, <br><br><div>Mathieu Weill</div><div>---------------</div><div>Depuis mon mobile, désolé pour le style</div></div><div><br>Le 10 oct. 2015 à 20:54, Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><p dir="ltr">Dear Co-Chairs,</p>
<p dir="ltr">FWIW, I think at this point, it will be good to have an understanding of where we are heading from the Co-Chairs. In some discussions it seem we have understood and agreed that a model that implies a structural change is impractical during this transition phase hence the suggestion made by Steve.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Yet in other discussions it seem we are going ahead with the structural change model irrespective of the concerns raised from parts of the community and board.</p>
<p dir="ltr">In other to prepare towards Dublin and contribute in a meaningful way, I think a summary of where we are presently and what is expected to be achieved in Dublin will be helpful. I apologise if this has already been shared, and in that case a pointer will be appreciated.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<p dir="ltr">Sent from my Asus Zenfone2<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 10 Oct 2015 19:37, "Stephen Deerhake" <<a href="mailto:sdeerhake@nic.as">sdeerhake@nic.as</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Paul,<br>
<br>
Perhaps the Board chair is articulating a minority viewpoint? Afterall, the<br>
Board will have to vote on the matter of sending/not sending the output of<br>
the CCWG on to NTIA.<br>
<br>
Stephen Deerhake<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Paul<br>
Rosenzweig<br>
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 6:05 AM<br>
To: 'Bruce Tonkin' <<a href="mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au">Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au</a>>; 'Accountability Cross<br>
Community' <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to<br>
Dublin<br>
<br>
With respect Bruce, I share Anne's view that this is not accurate. The<br>
Board chair has stated unequivocally that the Board will not submit a<br>
Membership based proposal. That is contrary to the statement that the Board<br>
will submit any proposal it receives from the CCWG "as is." That is<br>
categorically ruling out one type of "as is" proposal.<br>
<br>
If you are seriously telling me that even after all this back and forth the<br>
Board actually would submit a "Membership only" based proposal to the NTIA<br>
then I would respectfully say that the Board has done a very poor job of<br>
communicating.<br>
<br>
So ... answer this question please as directly as you are willing: If,<br>
today, the CCWG having considered but declined to accept the Board's input<br>
were to submit a proposal based upon a Membership organization would the<br>
Board transmit it to the NTIA as the ICANN proposal?<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
Paul Rosenzweig<br>
<a href="mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com">paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com</a><br>
O: <a href="tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20547-0660" value="+12025470660">+1 (202) 547-0660</a><br>
M: <a href="tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20329-9650" value="+12023299650">+1 (202) 329-9650</a><br>
VOIP: <a href="tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20738-1739" value="+12027381739">+1 (202) 738-1739</a><br>
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066<br>
Link to my PGP Key<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:<a href="mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au">Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au</a>]<br>
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 10:03 PM<br>
To: 'Accountability Cross Community'<br>
<<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to<br>
Dublin<br>
<br>
Hello Paul,<br>
<br>
Regarding:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-02-12-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-02-12-en</a><br>
<br>
The statement still holds.<br>
<br>
The Board has provided input on a draft document so far, and has stated all<br>
along that it would raise any concerns along the way and not wait for a<br>
final proposal to raise any concerns.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Bruce Tonkin<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>