<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top"><div>I don't think you are anything, in fact my original response didn't quote you and I don't understand why you responded in that hostile way. If someone asked a question and another person answers it, who are you to tell someone to not do so? Seriously, I want to know who you think you are.<br /><br />Ron</div></td></tr></table> <div id="_origMsg_">
<div>
<br />
<div>
<div style="font-size:0.9em">
<hr size="1">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span>
</b>
Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span>
</b>
Ron Baione <ron.baione@yahoo.com>; <el@lisse.NA>; <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc:</span>
</b>
<directors@omadhina.net>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span>
</b>
Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Where do we stand? <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span>
</b>
Mon, Oct 12, 2015 7:06:45 PM <br>
</div>
<br>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">(If you think I'm from the Corporate Dark Side, you've clearly never <br clear="none">been to an ICANN meeting -- and the public forum in particular -- at any <br clear="none">time between 1998 and the present day)<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">On 12/10/15 20:01, Ron Baione wrote:<br clear="none">> Nigel, The question was postualted, I answered it. Everytime the<br clear="none">> question is repostulated, I will reanswer it.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> We can all see what the strategy is, re-ask the same question until<br clear="none">> those who aren't "corporate enough" are shouted down. Declare the<br clear="none">> results of consensus that were never asked for. Delay tactics and<br clear="none">> consensus pushing are amateur hour, not going to work on me.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> Ron<br
clear="none">><br clear="none">><br clear="none">> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br clear="none">> *From: * Nigel Roberts <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net" href="javascript:return">nigel@channelisles.net</a>>;<br clear="none">> *To: * Ron Baione <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:ron.baione@yahoo.com" href="javascript:return">ron.baione@yahoo.com</a>>; <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:el@lisse.NA" href="javascript:return">el@lisse.NA</a>>;<br clear="none">> <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" href="javascript:return">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>>;<br clear="none">> *Cc: * <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:directors@omadhina.net" href="javascript:return">directors@omadhina.net</a>>;<br clear="none">> *Subject: * Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Where do we stand?<br clear="none">> *Sent: * Mon, Oct
12, 2015 6:55:01 PM<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> Ron<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> This is a Workstream 2 issue.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> Please give it a rest.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> On 12/10/15 19:47, Ron Baione wrote:<br clear="none">> > "E. What would the community take as evidence in the short term that<br clear="none">> > the Board is acting in good faith? I'm concerned by what appears to be<br clear="none">> > Board bashing on the list, wherein many things that any of us say or do<br clear="none">> > are interpreted negatively and perhaps conspiratorially. I realize that<br clear="none">> > the great majority of people involved int he CCSG process do not have<br clear="none">> > such attitudes, but predictably it only takes a very few individuals to<br clear="none">> > sour and confuse a discussion and lessen its
utility."<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > In my opinion, an agreement to the development of an external<br clear="none">> > whistleblower process to protect the post-tranaition process from bad<br clear="none">> > actor government and corporate agents' influence. No reason to waste<br clear="none">> > time on anything before knowing the post-transition process won't be a<br clear="none">> > facade of multistakeholder democracy. The moment the public finds out<br clear="none">> > from "wikileaks" etc, that nefarious activity occurred the internet will<br clear="none">> > become a 100% circus show, and that means conhressional hearings.<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > Ron<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br
clear="none">> > *From: * Dr Eberhard W Lisse <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:el@lisse.NA" href="javascript:return">el@lisse.NA</a> <javascript:return>>;<br clear="none">> > *To: * <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net" href="javascript:return">nigel@channelisles.net</a> <javascript:return>>;<br clear="none">> > <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" href="javascript:return">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a> <javascript:return>>;<br clear="none">> > *Cc: * <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:directors@omadhina.net" href="javascript:return">directors@omadhina.net</a> <javascript:return>>;<br clear="none">> > *Subject: * Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Where do we stand?<br clear="none">> > *Sent: * Mon, Oct 12, 2015 12:28:48 PM<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > Nigel,<br clear="none">>
><br clear="none">> > I don't see it like this.<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > At the moment they want us to blink first.<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > And if we do not, they either are going to pass forward unmodified<br clear="none">> > (with whatever comments they like, of course), or, overturn<br clear="none">> > themselves by resolution (which I would see as the nuclear option at<br clear="none">> > the moment).<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > greetings, el<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > On 2015-10-12 14:09, Nigel Roberts wrote:<br clear="none">> > [...]<br clear="none">> > > But it's all academic, since no matter what the consensus outcome, the<br clear="none">> > > Board reserves the right to reject it anyway.<br clear="none">> > [...]<br clear="none">>
><br clear="none">> > --<br clear="none">> > Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)<br clear="none">> > <a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:el@lisse.NA" href="javascript:return">el@lisse.NA</a> <javascript:return> <javascript:return> / *<div class="yqt8657454694" id="yqtfd42819"><br clear="none">> | Telephone: +264 81<br clear="none">> > 124 6733 (cell)<br clear="none">> > PO Box 8421 \ /<br clear="none">> > Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/<br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">> > _______________________________________________<br clear="none">> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br clear="none">> > <a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" href="javascript:return">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a> <javascript:return><br
clear="none">> <javascript:return><br clear="none">><br clear="none">> > <a shape="rect" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br clear="none">> ><br clear="none">><br clear="none"></div></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>