<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/17/15 9:51 AM, Steve DelBianco
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:27E858B5-694A-4A27-824E-053A5C5E9B01@netchoice.org"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div>
<div>
<div>In GAC session today, some said they did not understand
why we needed Stress Test 18.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
While January is quite a long time ago, even in ICANN process
development time, at the time when the BC provided their scenarios
to "Work Group #4" I wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">--
<br>
BC #6. GAC votes
<br>
<br>
The accountability issue here isn't obvious to me. The bylaws
create several Advisory Councils, each of which may have distinct
internal processes resulting in the issuance of advice. A change
in any AC's internal process does not necessarily create an
accountability issue.
<br>
<br>
I suggest this item should be discarded.
</blockquote>
<br>
Here we are, still using our very finite time, on a scenario the
better part of a year's aging has not improved.<br>
<br>
Eric Brunner-Williams<br>
Eugene, Oregon<br>
</body>
</html>