<p dir="ltr">It would also be great if there was some clarity on how ALAC proposes to deal with the enforceability problem without the legal personhood that forms the basis of the sole member model. </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 18 Oct 2015 18:56, "Drazek, Keith" <<a href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The "Reference Model" is the Sole Member model included in our last report.<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Phil Corwin <<a href="mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com">psc@vlaw-dc.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Point of information:<br>
> I know what the member and designator models are - but what is the reference model?<br>
><br>
><br>
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal<br>
><br>
> Virtualaw LLC<br>
><br>
> 1155 F Street, NW<br>
><br>
> Suite 1050<br>
><br>
> Washington, DC 20004<br>
><br>
> <a href="tel:202-559-8597" value="+912025598597">202-559-8597</a>/Direct<br>
><br>
> <a href="tel:202-559-8750" value="+912025598750">202-559-8750</a>/Fax<br>
><br>
> <a href="tel:202-255-6172" value="+912022556172">202-255-6172</a>/cell<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ________________________________________<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>] on behalf of Drazek, Keith [<a href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>]<br>
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 8:46 AM<br>
> To: James Gannon<br>
> Cc: Accountability Cross Community<br>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] ALAC Position on Membership<br>
><br>
> I agree an explanation would be helpful. Particularly around the choice of timing.<br>
><br>
> Keith<br>
><br>
>> On Oct 18, 2015, at 1:43 PM, James Gannon <<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi All,<br>
>><br>
>> Given the announcement a few moments ago that the ALAC has voted to no longer support the reference model as presented in the second draft, for those of us who were not able to be in the room I think it would be great if some of our ALAC participants could give a brief overview of the reason for this change and give us some context for this vote taken by the ALAC just so we are fully informed and up to speed.<br>
>><br>
>> I don’t want to start a debate but merely would like to be better informed as to the reasoning and background.<br>
>><br>
>> -James Gannon<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</blockquote></div>