<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div name="messageBodySection">Are the ALAC appointed members now raising an objection against the report?<br />
<br />
In other words we no longer have (any) Consensus?<br />
<br />
If so, what does that mean?<br />
<br />
Can we go home now?<br />
<br />
Do we need to write a new report for new Public Comment?<br />
<br />
Can the ALAC appointed members continue to remain members or do they need to be replaced by ALAC with individuals who can be taken serious?<br />
<br />
greetings, el</div>
<div name="messageSignatureSection"><br />
--<br />
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5s<br /></div>
<div name="messageReplySection"><br />
On 18 Oct 2015, 14:45 +0100, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, wrote:<br />
<blockquote type="cite">In its formal response to the CCWG-Accountability proposal issued in<br />
August 2015, the ALAC said that it could support the model being<br />
proposed, but preferred something far less complex and<br />
lighter-weight, and that we saw no need for the level of<br />
enforceability that the proposal provided. Moreover, the ALAC had<br />
specific concerns with the budget veto and the apparent lack of<br />
participation of perhaps a majority of AC/SOs.<br />
<br />
In light of the reconsideration of a designator model by the CCWG,<br />
along with the recommendations of the Saturday morning break-out<br />
sessions, the ALAC felt that a revised statement was in order.<br />
Accordingly we decided, by a unanimous vote of the 14 ALAC members<br />
present (with 1 not present), to withdraw support for the Membership model.<br />
<br />
I want to make it clear that this is not a "red line" decision.<br />
Should a Membership model become one that is generally advocated by<br />
the CCWG, and supported by a supermajority of Board directors (who<br />
ultimately MUST support any changes that they will be called upon to<br />
approve, else they would be in violation of their fiduciary duty),<br />
then the ALAC reserves its right to support such a model.<br />
<br />
Alan Greenberg<br />
Chair, At-Large Advisory Committee<br />
<br />
_______________________________________________<br />
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br />
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<br />
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<br /></blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>