<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top"><div>After looking at the sole member and sole designator models, in contrast to the board's proposal which is inadequate in my opinion, I will vote for the sole member model because it includes:<br /><br />"• Sole Member has statutory standing under California corporate law to enforce this right; direct enforceability by Sole Member.<br />• Sole Member would have statutory right under California law to initiate or adopt bylaws amendments on its own, but the exercise of this right could be practically curtailed through internal Sole Member mechanisms."<br /><br />The connection referenced to actual statutory laws in the Sole Member model will provide more assurance to the internet community as a whole to trust the post-transition system in my opinion.<br /><br />Ron</div></td></tr></table> <div id="_origMsg_">
<div>
<br />
<div>
<div style="font-size:0.9em">
<hr size="1">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span>
</b>
Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span>
</b>
Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span>
</b>
[CCWG-ACCT] Draft Table to compare Sole Des and Sole Mem <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span>
</b>
Mon, Oct 19, 2015 5:51:38 PM <br>
</div>
<br>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><div dir="ltr">Hi all<div><br></div><div>As mentioned in the AC room chat, I've drafted a table based on what Mathieu set out in the slide - bringing together criteria for assessing the two "Sole" models.</div><div><br></div><div>It's a google doc here: <<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bu6ze45ONESJyO_f3RCpEafQsb1VAPgCFHtmWsNIIoM/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bu6ze45ONESJyO_f3RCpEafQsb1VAPgCFHtmWsNIIoM/edit?usp=sharing</a>></div><div><br></div><div>PDF and Word docs attached.</div><div><br></div><div>In thinking about these criteria, I'd urge a look back at our Counsel's work on comparing the two models. Also attached.</div><div><br></div><div>This might be up for review and then we might use it on Wednesday.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Feedback
welcome!</div><div><br></div><div>cheers</div><div>Jordan</div><div><br></div></div></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>