<div dir="ltr"><div>Anne,</div><div>No single advice against or single objection against shall not veto the separation or any decision taken by consensus for those other participation in the process.</div><div>I mentioned that yesterday and Mathieu confirmed that .</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-10-20 10:39 GMT+02:00 Christopher Wilkinson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu" target="_blank">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="-ms-word-wrap: break-word;">All Member options will be appraised against the bench mark as to which will most securely guarantee to prevent separation.<div><br></div><div>CW</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div><div class="h5"><div>On 20 Oct 2015, at 09:21, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <<a href="mailto:AAikman@lrrlaw.com" target="_blank">AAikman@lrrlaw.com</a>> wrote:</div><br></div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div style="margin-bottom:45px">
<div style="font-size:10pt"><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><br>
</div><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">Using the PTI separation process, policy recommendation from GNSO and Numbers is to separate PTI and place in an SA in Paris. GAC consensus advice to the Board is against separation. Over 2/3 of Board agrees
with the GAC and takes GAC advice. What happens under each of the two models and on the Staircase? How do the specifics of the PTI process interact with the Staircase?</div><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><br>
</div><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">Anne</div>
<div style="font-size:9pt;font-style:italic;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px" dir="ltr"><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Tablet</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<hr>
<font color="gray" face="Arial" size="1"><br>
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
<br>
</font>
</div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>