<div dir="ltr">Dear Avri,<div><br></div><div>This is extremely helpful and an excellent contribution!</div><div><br></div><div>Questions:</div><div> </div><div><div>1) As per Annex L of the CWG proposal (Para 1390), wouldnt the recommendation of the IFR for the creation of the SCWG also require GNSO & ccNSO supermajority approval and CM approval? Accordingly, I have created a revised version of the process that I understood (in a separate document since I am not able to add it your document). Please correct me if I am wrong.</div></div><div><a href="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1NYLD847RoUWZDOT-_1wIlsHxjXo3guax-tYEKTga-lY/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1NYLD847RoUWZDOT-_1wIlsHxjXo3guax-tYEKTga-lY/edit?usp=sharing</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>2) How would the procedure comparatively differ in case of a membership model? Would board approval be replaced by member approval in both steps where board approval is required? Or would the member approval be invoked only after board rejection?</div><div><br></div><div>3) In case the board is spilled and then reconstituted, would the process begin from square 1 (reconstitution of IFR), or would the process continue from the point where it was rejected by the spilled board?</div><div><br></div><div>4) Under what scenarios can arbitration be invoked in case of board rejection? Say the board rejects the recommendation citing security and stability - in that case on what grounds can the community resort to arbitration - which bylaw would the board have vitiated for arbitration to be invoked?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div>Guru</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Avri Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I have attempted to draw up a discussion set of slides on the connection<br>
between the CWG process for Separability and the CCWG accountability<br>
and enforcement measures.<br>
<br>
The drive doc is open for comments:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1kmDLv0yF41lb9OBlCKnl6o3TMps6AlTF8Njso5zcW9w/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1kmDLv0yF41lb9OBlCKnl6o3TMps6AlTF8Njso5zcW9w/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
<br>
I have also attached a PDF.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>