<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I'm hardly a status quoist, and I'm not "stopping reforms." These additional issues will be addressed and should be addressed -- in WS2. So, I have no idea who or what you are referring to.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Nigel Roberts <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net" target="_blank">nigel@channelisles.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">+1<span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
On 10/30/2015 05:28 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Once the Transparency "asks" start, they tend not to stop. Just hook<br>
</blockquote></span><span class="im HOEnZb">
...<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
If we give the Designator (as controlled by SO/ACs) the same inspection<br>
rights it would have if it were a member under California law, including<br>
the enforcement rights that accompany this, we have "bridged the gap."<br>
</blockquote></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>