<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>I’ve attached a revised deck trying to lay out our conclusions from last night.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. We concluded to resolve the support/coordinate problem by eliminating the chapeau in the Mission Statement. See Slide 1 and the side-by-side document</div>
<div>2. Kavouss strongly urged us to modify the language of the regulatory preclusion. I have taken a shot at that in purple in the side-by-side document</div>
<div>3. Greg Shatan proposed a modification to the contracting language also reflected in purple on slide 2</div>
<div>4. We agreed to put transparency points 1 and 2 in WS1 and to address points 3 and 4 as part of WS2.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Becky</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>J. Beckwith Burr</div>
<div>Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>