<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top"><div>If people had a problem with the "subject line" created by someone else "inadvertantly" posted to ccwg, you should have spoken up immediately. No one did, therefore everyone who is feigning objection after the fact lost this argument. I won't apologize for other people's selective revisionism and phony astonishment simply to get rid of an "old foe", disliking me for being a person with an interest in Internet Governance and not over-relying on a neat looking business card.<br /><br />Ron</div></td></tr></table> <div id="_origMsg_">
<div>
<br />
<div>
<div style="font-size:0.9em">
<hr size="1">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span>
</b>
Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span>
</b>
Ron Baione <ron.baione@yahoo.com>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span>
</b>
[offlist] Regarding CCWG reaction to your posting <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span>
</b>
Sun, Nov 15, 2015 1:45:39 AM <br>
</div>
<br>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Hello Ron,<BR><BR>>> Care to articulate what exactly it is that you found offensive?<BR><BR>Group members are reacting to the subject of your post rather than the content.<BR><BR>The subject was: Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Paris Terrorist Attack<BR><BR>I think you inadvertently replied to a posting to the CCWG list on the Paris Terrorist Attack. It would have been better to create a fresh subject heading e.g. “Improvements to the Whistle blower process.”<BR><BR>I recommend you simply apologize for using the wrong subject heading.<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Bruce Tonkin<BR></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>