<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>I don’t support Nigel and Milton’s view that we need to finish the public comment before asking chartering orgs about their positions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As our CCWG charter requires, we are now asking chartering orgs whether they support CCWG recommendations. Anyone who is part of a chartering org (for example, Milton and I are part of GNSO), can voice their views and concerns within their chartering
org to influence the chartering organization's position. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Any individual, whether or not they are pat of a chartering org, could broadcast their concerns about the CCWG proposal so that could be considered by chartering orgs in their internal deliberations. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>For all these reasons, let’s continue to focus efforts on understanding concerns and questions raised by our chartering orgs, according to their own internal procedures and timelines.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div id="MAC_OUTLOOK_SIGNATURE"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:12pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Nigel Roberts <<a href="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net">nigel@channelisles.net</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 1:55 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Issues with Providing Public Comments on CCWG-Accountability Proposal<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>I totally agree.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>How can the SOs make any reasonsed decision without having the necessity </div>
<div>of taking into account the submitted comments when the comment period </div>
<div>has closed.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>And I shall say so, in the ccNSO.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On 12/02/2015 06:46 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;">
<div>We should have a complete and open public comment period, and then allow</div>
<div>the chartering orgs to make up their mind. To my mind, that should be</div>
<div>sequential rather than simultaneous, otherwise doubts could be raised</div>
<div>about whether the public comment is meaningful.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>_______________________________________________</div>
<div>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</div>
<div><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></div>
<div><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>