Can staff go back and look at the history of this (in both published and internal versions)?<span></span><div><br></div><div>This may be a case where the rule "assume nothing" should apply.</div><div><br><br>On Tuesday, December 8, 2015, Malcolm Hutty <<a href="mailto:malcolm@linx.net">malcolm@linx.net</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
On 08/12/2015 14:40, David Post wrote:<br>
> I think we're all in agreement that it's the openness, stabiity, etc. of<br>
> the DNS. So we should say that directly, adding the words "of the DNS"<br>
> at the end.<br>
<br>
Are we?<br>
<br>
The NTIA transition requirements specify the need to maintain the<br>
"security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS" but the<br>
"openness of the Internet."<br>
<br>
--<br>
Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523<br>
Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog<br>
London Internet Exchange | <a href="http://publicaffairs.linx.net/" target="_blank">http://publicaffairs.linx.net/</a><br>
<br>
London Internet Exchange Ltd<br>
Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ<br>
<br>
Company Registered in England No. 3137929<br>
Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org')">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</blockquote></div>