<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div><br></div><div><br>On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:15, Gregory, Holly <<a href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">We will need information on the
</span><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">kind of provisions that PICs have typically included. Could ICANN legal provide that information to us?</span></blockquote><br><div>And therein lies the rub.</div><div><br></div><div>I think CCWG members are likely to have differing views as to what should be considered "typical" and what aberrant. Nor would I consider ICANN legal a neutral advisor to you on this, if it were making any kind of qualitative judgement. </div></body></html>