<html><head></head><body>I read the "they" as being the formally appointed CCWG Members, to whom the charter gives voting rights.<br>
<br>
Alan <br>
-- <br>
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On December 29, 2015 1:26:44 PM EST, "Chartier, Mike S" <mike.s.chartier@intel.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Avri,<br /> I'm a little confused. What do you mean by "they should decide on those issues"?<br /><br />Mike<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:07 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:<br /> <br /> Hi,<br /> <br /> I am not into rushing.<br /> And certainly not into rushing for rushing sake.<br /> <br /> But we have committed ourselves to getting the work done and we have a<br /> world of people waiting for us to make and end of it. We have been<br /> slipping our schedule. While the reasons for slipping the schedule may<br /> be legitimate (not always certain of that) it does not mean we haven't<br /> slipped on promises. We continue to slip. I think this commits us to do<br /> our best to just keep putting one foot in front of the other and<br /> continuing to do our best to get the work done. That is not done by<br /> taking a
leisurely time, but is one the aided by focusing on the work<br /> intensively.<br /> <br /> I still think we should be considering intensive online working weekends. <br /> <br /> I also think it may be time for the members among us (I am not one) to<br /> do some deciding on the issues where we still do not have full<br /> consensus. For example, if at the end of the intense work period in<br /> January we are still arguing about some details, they should decide on<br /> those issues, we should document that fact, and move on.<br /> <br /> avri<br /> <br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 29-Dec-15 12:15, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:<br /> Yes <br /> Some people rush and rush.<br /> In some of the working party meeting in the past there was about 10 participant since others could not afford that.<br /> Multiplication if meetings and extension of their duration does not always have good resu
lts.<br
/> We need good plan,good preparation and advance working document and establishment of priorities<br /> Kavousd<br /> <br /> <br /> Sent from my iPhone<br /> <br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #8ae234; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 25 Dec 2015, at 01:41, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:<br /> <br /> Hi,<br /> <br /> I think the intensive schedule is necessary and we will find a way if we<br /> want to have any chance of succeeding with an IANA Transition in 2016.<br /> <br /> I also think 3hr meetings are ok. We might even consider one or more<br /> of those remote weekends of meetings when they do not interfere with<br /> people's work.<br /> <br /> avri<br /> <br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #fcaf3e; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 24-Dec-15 06:58, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:<br /> Dear Mathieu<br /> Thank you for your suggestion<br /> As I told you at various occ
ations,
human being mental capacity should<br /> not be overloaded.<br /> I have participated in many conference calls since years.<br /> Any call which lasts more than two hours was totally inefficient<br /> Pls then reduce the duration to maximum two hours<br /> Regards<br /> Kavouss<br /> <br /> 2015-12-24 12:25 GMT+01:00 James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net<br /> <mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net>>:<br /> <br /> I don’t forsee anyone who is not being compensated for their work<br /> being able to dedicate 6 hours from a working week to this, I<br /> object to rushing things and designing schedules which are<br /> unrealistic IMO.<br /> <br /> -Jg<br /> <br /> From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org<br /> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org>> on<br /> behalf of Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr<br /> <mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>><br /> Date: Thursday 24 December 2015 at 11:22 a.m.<
br />
To: 'Accountability Cross Community'<br /> <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<br /> <mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>><br /> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January<br /> <br /> Dear Colleagues,<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> In line with the work plan discussion held on call #72, we wish to<br /> inform you that we have decided to increase the number of calls<br /> per week to two to allow for an in-depth analysis of the input<br /> received on our Draft Proposal, and discuss any complex requests<br /> for change there may be. It is currently foreseen that this<br /> frequency of calls will only apply to the month of January.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> As discussed on 22 December, these calls will be plenary and <br /> topic-based. You will receive a list of topics in advance of the<br /> meetings so that you may plan your participation accordingly.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Duration of the calls will also be exte
nded to
3 hours to allow<br /> for ample time to complete our tasks. Calls will be cancelled<br /> (and/or duration will be reduced) if deemed unnecessary. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Please note that staff will send invites as well as overview of<br /> the conference call calendar shortly.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> We look forward to reconvening in January and wish you a happy<br /> holiday season for those of you who celebrate.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Best regards<br /> <br /> Mathieu – Thomas - León<br /> <br /> <br /><hr /><br /> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br /> Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<br /> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org><br /> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /><hr /><br /> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br />
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<br /> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br /></blockquote> <br /> ---<br /> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br /> <a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><br /> <br /><hr /><br /> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br /> Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<br /> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br /></blockquote></blockquote> <br /> <br /> ---<br /> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br /> <a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><br /> <br /><hr /><br /> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br /> Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<br
/> <a
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br /></blockquote><hr /><br />Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br />Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<br /><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>