<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">All,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Malcolm confirmed his issue was around all the N/A's in the summary sheets in columns D, E and F.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">This is to be expected. As the overarching title of these three columns states "If no survey response - staff assessment".</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">As such if there was a response given in the survey monkey these columns are not filled in and contain N/A (almost 57% of responses used the survey).</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Additionally if the survey monkey form was not used and a respondent did not comment on a recommendation those columns will also contain N/A (there were quite a few of these also).</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Hope this clears up any misconceptions.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Cheers.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">B.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Malcolm Hutty <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:malcolm@linx.net" target="_blank">malcolm@linx.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'm also a bit confused by the prevalence of "N/A".<br>
<br>
There seem to be a great many cases where the respondent writes "We<br>
support this recommendation and ... (think/stress X,Y,Z)" where the item<br>
is marked as "N/A" in the support/disagreement columns.<br>
<br>
But it looks as though surveymonkey and direct replies may have been<br>
counted separately.<br>
<br>
Nor is it at all clear on what basis some replies have been picked out<br>
for "analysis", but not others.<br>
<br>
Perhaps the staff could give more of an explanation as to how this was<br>
constructed?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Malcolm.<br>
<br>
On 06/01/2016 16:44, Schaefer, Brett wrote:<br>
> Alice,<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Thank you for this. The Heritage Foundation’s opposition to full GAC<br>
> participation in the empowered community was not noted in the Rec 1<br>
> analysis. As stated in our comment, we think that GAC should be strictly<br>
> advisory.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Rec 7 analysis, I’m concerned that our position may be misunderstood.<br>
> We support including DIDP in an appeals process, but we are very much<br>
> against restricting it to the engagement, escalation, and enforcement<br>
> staircase because that process is dependent on the Empowered Community.<br>
> DIDP appeals need to be accessible to everyone, not just the SOACs, and<br>
> appeals should not require SOAC approval at any threshold. This may<br>
> require moving DIDP appeals to the request for reconsideration process.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Rec 11, the one sentence summary gives the impression that we support<br>
> Rec 11. We do not and offered specific proposals on how to change the<br>
> text to address our concerns, which were not included in the Rec 11<br>
> analysis.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Best wishes,<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Brett<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> BrettSchaefer<br>
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs<br>
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National<br>
> Security and Foreign Policy<br>
> The Heritage Foundation<br>
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE<br>
> Washington, DC 20002<br>
> <a href="tel:202-608-6097" value="+12026086097">202-608-6097</a><br>
> <a href="http://heritage.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">heritage.org</a> <<a href="http://heritage.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://heritage.org/</a>><br>
><br>
> *From:*<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>] *On Behalf Of<br>
> *Alice Jansen<br>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 06, 2016 9:04 AM<br>
> *To:* <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><br>
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] On behalf of Co-Chairs - Public comment<br>
> summary/analysis<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _On behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs_<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Dear all,<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Attached to this email you will find a staff produced summary and<br>
> analysis of the public comments received on our Draft Proposal.<br>
><br>
> In preparation for our January discussions, we encourage you to read the<br>
> document as well as comments available for full reference<br>
> at: <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/</a>.<br>
> Note: a /download all/ page is available<br>
> at <a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56984613" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56984613</a><br>
><br>
> Please note that we cannot convert the spreadsheet into a PDF, the tabs<br>
> and spreadsheet being too large. Thank you for your understanding.<br>
><br>
> Staff will post the summary on the public forum box on Friday, 8 January<br>
> - <a href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-2015-11-30-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-2015-11-30-en</a>.<br>
> In the meantime, it is located on your wiki<br>
> at <a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56984613" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56984613</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Thank you<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Best regards<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Mathieu, Thomas, León<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
Malcolm Hutty | tel: <a href="tel:%2B44%2020%207645%203523" value="+442076453523">+44 20 7645 3523</a><br>
Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog<br>
London Internet Exchange | <a href="http://publicaffairs.linx.net/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://publicaffairs.linx.net/</a><br>
<br>
London Internet Exchange Ltd<br>
Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ<br>
<br>
Company Registered in England No. 3137929<br>
Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>