<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Seun,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">My guess is that was based on our (now-outdated but not yet replaced) timeline, and without taking notice of the situation as it has unfolded since that timeline was circulated.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Seun Ojedeji <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">On 20 Jan 2016 17:34, "Konstantinos Komaitis" <<a href="mailto:komaitis@isoc.org" target="_blank">komaitis@isoc.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Dear all,<span class=""><br>
><br>
> Later this week, ICANN’s Chartering Organizations will indicate whether they will support the third draft proposal of the CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 1 Recommendations. <br>
><br></span>
SO: I don't know what gives this impression but while its good to be optimistic, I am not sure the statement above is close to being realistically possible. I wish it was, but as this process progress it somehow feels we are getting further away from ending WS1 :(</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>