I'm referring to the same laws as Holly was. I have no idea why you think these do not apply to "non-state actors" -- that's exactly who they are supposed to apply to.<div><br></div><div>I also have no idea why you apparently believe ICANN is currently bound by laws that apply to "state actors." ICANN is not currently a state actor. It is a private non-profit corporation incorporated and domiciled in the State of California which performs certain functions under a contract with the US Government. The contract includes a large number of provisions that apply to ICANN and all other government contractors, none of which make ICANN a "state actor."</div><div><br></div><div>Greg</div><div><span></span> </div><div>On Friday, January 22, 2016, Nigel Roberts <<a href="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net">nigel@channelisles.net</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Please quote your authority that any such laws exist in the US with effect on non-state actors.<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
(including applicable laws that protect Human Rights) will not change with the transition.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote></div>