<p dir="ltr">On 22 Jan 2016 5:29 p.m., "Mueller, Milton L" <<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu">milton@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > It seems to me that the whole point of the tussle of policy development is to<br>
> > consider a wide variety of considerations and input.<br>
> > It seems to me that the source of that lies in the community, and therefore it<br>
> > is the community, and not the corporation, that needs the commitment to<br>
> > human rights.<br>
><br>
> The answer to this is simple: the only way to bind "the community" as a whole to respect HR is to require the corporation that approves and implements its policy making to respect HR.<br>
><br>
SO: Very strong but I hope this is not true considering that the corporation (ICANN) serves not just the names but the numbers and protocol communities.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards<br>
> --MM<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</p>