<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><font color="#002e7a" class="">Mathieu and all,</font><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class="">The WS2 is the duty of the CCWG as per its charter. In fact, the charter divided the work of the CCWG into 2 parts: WS1 and WS2. The CCWG will not accomplish its work till it finish the WS2 work. I’m so surprised to hear that another group will undertake the duty of the CCWG related to WS2.</font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class="">CCWG must continue its work till the completion of WS2. </font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class="">The text proposed says: </font></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="color: rgb(0, 46, 122); white-space: pre;"> </span>a Framework of Interpretation is developed as part of “Work Stream 2” by the CCWG-Accountability or another Cross Community Working Group chartered for such <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>purpose by one or more Supporting Organizations or Advisory Committees. </div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class="">This can’t work because it gives the right to a single SO or AC to charter a group that will develop a FoI allowing for the bylaw provision related to Human Rights to enter into force.</font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class="">Even if I find a "dormant" bylaw useless, I may accept the proposed language only if it is changed in the following way (not necessarily the same wording, but leading to this meaning):</font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Within its Mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect internationally recognized Human Rights. This commitment shall not in any way create an obligation for <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>ICANN, or any entity having a relationship with ICANN, to protect or enforce Human Rights beyond what may be required by applicable law. In particular, this does not <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>create any additional obligation for ICANN to respond to or consider any complaint, request, or demand seeking the enforcement of Human Rights by ICANN. This <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Bylaw provision will not enter into force until a Framework of Interpretation is developed as part of “Work Stream 2” by the CCWG-Accountability, ratified by the <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>chartering organizations and adopted by the ICANN Board. </div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class=""> </font></div><div class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
<div style="letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">-----------------------------------------------------------------------------</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class=""><b class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">Tijani BEN JEMAA</span></b></div><div apple-content-edited="true" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">Directeur Exécutif </span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">Fédération Méditerranéenne des associations d'Internet (</span><b style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">FMAI</b><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">)</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">Phone: +216 98 330 114</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class=""> </span> <span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class=""> +216 52 385 114</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">-----------------------------------------------------------------------------</span> </div></div></div>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Le 26 janv. 2016 à 22:06, Mathieu Weill <<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" class="">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>> a écrit :</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">Thank you Bruce,<br class=""><br class="">For the benefit of the Board members as well as colleagues who did not<br class="">attend the call, a short summary from our conclusions today based on the<br class="">meeting notes. This conclusion was achieved after closely listening to the<br class="">Board's concerns raised in the 3rd public comment, and assessing various<br class="">alternate proposals during our 3 plenary working sessions.<br class=""><br class="">Action item is now for staff and lawyers to move to finalizing<br class="">recommendation consistent with the proposal discussed and comments<br class="">expressed during the session -(such as Alan). No further plenary<br class="">discussion is planned unless, as suggested by Kavouss, the Board would<br class="">come back with a concrete action or resolution that would convince the<br class="">group to proceed otherwise.<br class=""><br class="">And the proposed text during the session was :<br class=""><quote>Within its Mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect<br class="">internationally recognized Human Rights. This commitment shall not in any<br class="">way create an obligation for ICANN, or any entity having a relationship<br class="">with ICANN, to protect or enforce Human Rights beyond what may be required<br class="">by applicable law. In particular, this does not create any additional<br class="">obligation for ICANN to respond to or consider any complaint, request, or<br class="">demand seeking the enforcement of Human Rights by ICANN. This Bylaw<br class="">provision will not enter into force until a Framework of Interpretation is<br class="">developed as part of “Work Stream 2” by the CCWG-Accountability or another<br class="">Cross Community Working Group chartered for such purpose by one or more<br class="">Supporting Organizations or Advisory Committees. ICANN shall support the<br class="">establishment and work of such a Group to facilitate development of the<br class="">Framework of Interpretation as promptly as possible.</><br class=""><br class="">Best regards,<br class="">Mathieu<br class=""><br class="">-----Message d'origine-----<br class="">De : <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org" class="">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a><br class="">[<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org" class="">mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>] De la part de<br class="">Bruce Tonkin<br class="">Envoyé : mardi 26 janvier 2016 21:17<br class="">À : CCWG Accountability<br class="">Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] ICANN Board comments on Recommendation 6<br class="">Importance : Haute<br class=""><br class="">Hello All,<br class=""><br class="">Markus gave a verbal summary of the current position of the Board<br class="">following our Board call yesterday during the CCWG call. I have set out<br class="">the current position in writing below.<br class=""><br class="">I recognize that the CCWG members did not accept the Board's position.<br class="">There are quite a few Board members on the call - and we can take this<br class="">discussion back to the Board to see if we can find another solution.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">(1) The Board is committed to upholding human rights as appropriate within<br class="">ICANN's mission; and<br class=""><br class="">(2) The Board intends to work alongside the community to progress the<br class="">human rights work within ICANN, including through the development of a<br class="">Human Rights Statement to reach a meaningful framework to guide human<br class="">rights considerations within ICANN's mission. <br class=""><br class="">The Board still remains supportive of Option B, or allowing the WS2 effort<br class="">on defining a framework to proceed prior to considering whether to include<br class="">a human rights obligation in the Bylaws.<br class=""><br class="">The Board understands that one of the reasons for the suggestion of a<br class="">"dormant" bylaw text (which the Board remains concerned about for the<br class="">reasons flagged earlier) is that there is concern among the community that<br class="">if a reference to human rights is not included in the Bylaws, the Board<br class="">will not follow through on a community wish to address this issue. To<br class="">address this concern, the Board proposes that including in the Bylaws a<br class="">requirement for ICANN to address the human rights issue, as well as a<br class="">requirement to consider - after a framework is concluded - how that should<br class="">be referenced in the Bylaws. The Board therefore proposes the following: <br class=""><br class="">In the Bylaws text referencing WS2, language should be included that<br class="">specifically identifies that a recommended framework on human rights<br class="">within ICANN is expected to be part of the WS2 effort. Further, the<br class="">Bylaws on WS2 should specify that If the cross-community group developing<br class="">the framework also makes a consensus recommendation on whether and how<br class="">that framework can be reflected in the ICANN Bylaws, the ICANN Board must<br class="">consider that recommendation according to the process defined for<br class="">considering those continuous improvement recommendations.<br class=""><br class="">Regards,<br class=""><br class="">Bruce Tonkin<br class=""><br class="">ICANN Board liaison to the CCWG<br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" class="">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br class="">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<br class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>