<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>There are many comments that were not possible to be agreed upon.</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavousd</div><div><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 27 Jan 2016, at 19:20, Alan Greenberg <<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
This was not meant to start a debate. It was one of the issues raised in
the ALAC comments and I said I would list the open ones. I di not think
it needs debate, just perhaps an aditional sentence added in the
proposal.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 27/01/2016 09:02 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite="">Dear All,<br>
I think people contuinue to go to the last milimiter of the road and
generate a new discussion and debate about the number of représentatives
in Unincorprated associattion représentatives and start a new
round of bebates and dispute<br>
Do we need this information now pls ?<br>
Kavouss <br><br>
2016-01-27 6:14 GMT+01:00 Alan Greenberg
<<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>
>:<br>
<dl>
<dd>As per my comment in the CCWG meeting earlier today, here is a list
of the issues still to be resolved from the ALAC statement on the 3rd
Draft Proposal.<br><br>
<br>
</dd><dd>There are three issues currently under discussion.<br><br>
</dd><dd>1. ICANN Mission and ensuring that contract provisions will not be
invalidated or be unenforceable.<br><br>
</dd><dd>2. The issue regarding market mechanisms.<br><br>
</dd><dd>3. Human Rights (original issue resolved but pending final
wording).<br><br>
<br>
</dd><dd>Issues to be addressed.<br><br>
<br>
</dd><dd>1. The first is a relatively trivial one and easily addressed. Rec#
4, in the section on replacing the Interim Board states:<br><br>
</dd><dd>"SOs, ACs, and the Nominating Committee will develop replacement
processes that ensure the Interim Board will not be in place for more
than 120 days."<br><br>
</dd><dd>The ALAC request that this be changed to:<br><br>
</dd><dd>"SOs, ACs, and the Nominating Committee will develop processes
designed to replace Interim Board members within 120 days."<br><br>
</dd><dd>By removing the word "ensure", this change, while not
altering the intent, goes along with the recent practice of not putting
hard deadlines in the Bylaws, deadlines that for one reason or another
may not be met in a particular instance.<br><br>
<br>
</dd><dd>2. Rec# 10, AoC. The Recommendation suggests that as part of
organizational reviews, the AC/SO's accountability be included in the
review. The ALAC suggests that this be enshrined in Article IV, Section
4.1 of the ICANN Bylaws.<br><br>
<br>
</dd><dd>3. On page 14, item 2 of the draft proposal (and on page 5 of Annex
1), it says "The members of the unincorporated association would be
representatives of ICANN's Supporting Organizations and Advisory
Committees that wish to participate." We have never discussed how
such members are identified. Presumably we should to specify that each
participating AC/SO must identify who it's representative will
be.<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
</dd><dd>_______________________________________________<br>
</dd><dd>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
</dd><dd><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
</dd><dd>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
<br><br>
</dd></dl></blockquote>
</div></blockquote></body></html>