<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>Kavouss,</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">I am a pretty simple person. I am not saying it should be win lose or lose lose. I just would like to see the GAC (or any group) clearly state what a win win situation would be in their minds. The GAC as a group has not stated
clearly what that would be. We shouldn't be in a position of having to guess. The GNSO statements have been clear. The Board statements have been clear. The ALAC statements have been clear. I would love for the GAC statement to be just as clear and state
something like what I think some GAC members on this list is stating, namely, "we support the definition of consensus as stated in the draft, but only if the 2/3 threshold is adopted." (If that is what they mean). I just have never seen that stated.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Thanks. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
Sent from my iPad</div>
<div><br>
On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:54 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>GAC did not formally reject the Rec 11 in announcing that " no consensus is reached " GNSO and its spokemen push for their objection, GAC must formally reject the Recommendation as currently GAC lost o-1 because of Stress Test 18 ,if such ST remains and
2/ 3 supermajority becomes Simple Majority then GAC would loose o-2 .That is not fair .There should not win loose against GAC,
</div>
<div>WIN-WIN YES, loose-loose yes ,for every body BUT NOT LOOSE FOR gac and win for the others .</div>
<div>THAT IS NOT FAIR </div>
<div>Kavouss </div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-01-28 23:45 GMT+01:00 Andrew Sullivan <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com" target="_blank">ajs@anvilwalrusden.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span>On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:26:54PM +0000, Jeff Neuman wrote:<br>
> Where in writing has the GAC stated that it will reject the accountability proposal of the 2/3 threshold is not in there.<br>
<br>
</span>I didn't intend to suggest that they'd stated that in writing, but<br>
rather to suggest that the GAC had consensus around the 2/3 number.<br>
But this'll teach me to go from memory, because I was relying on my<br>
recollection of the Dublin communiqé. In fact it does not exactly say<br>
that the GAC has consensus about the 2/3 threshold, so I'm wrong.<br>
<br>
I still believe that the compromise position is an effective way<br>
forward that actually gives no additional real power to the GAC<br>
(because of the new Empowered Community) while yet granting the 2/3<br>
number that many seem to think is important. But the claim in favour<br>
of 2/3 is indeed weaker given the GAC's stated positions.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
A<br>
<br>
--<br>
Andrew Sullivan<br>
<a href="mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com">ajs@anvilwalrusden.com</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>