<p dir="ltr">On 29 Jan 2016 10:11 p.m., "Mueller, Milton L" <<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu">milton@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > -----Original Message-----<br>
> ><br>
> > Isn't it so that any guidance or PDP adopted by 2/3 by the GNSO must be<br>
> > adopted by the Board?<br>
><br>
> No, it is not. The GAC has routinely interfered with and altered GNSO guidance via its "advice."<br>
><br>
SO: Actually if this is true, I don't think its right to say GAC did this but rather that board made this happen. We cannot have a board that does not have option to decide independently be it on GAC advice/ALAC's or any other policy outcome of an SO. As far as I am concerned, the most neutral part of this community remains the board and they require adequate means of exercising that role.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</p>