<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Dear Jorge and Kavouss</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">As you may recall, there was this very helpful response from Thomas when I raised this question in the chat during CCWG meeting 82:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><p style="margin:10px 0px 0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13.3333330154419px;line-height:19.0476188659668px"><i>Mark Carvell GAC - UK Govt: (01:40) REC 11 Sorry to go back to previous agenda item 2 on Rec 11. Can you confirm that the upcoming focus issue call(s) will consider only the two proposals by Becky and Kavouss and that no WHOLLY new propoal will be considered. I think it is imporrtant to make this clear if we are to achieve closure by next week - which everyone wants I'm sure!</i></p></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><p style="margin:10px 0px 0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13.3333330154419px;line-height:19.0476188659668px"><i> Thomas Rickert, CCWG Co-Chair: (01:41) Mark, we do not have indications for other proposals than those from Kavouss and Becky.</i></p></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><p style="margin:10px 0px 0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13.3333330154419px;line-height:19.0476188659668px"><i> jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland): (01:41) +1 Mark</i><span style="font-size:13.3333330154419px;line-height:19.0476188659668px">.</span></p></div></blockquote><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><p style="margin:10px 0px 0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13.3333330154419px;line-height:19.0476188659668px">Kind regards</p></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><p style="margin:10px 0px 0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13.3333330154419px;line-height:19.0476188659668px">Mark</p></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Mark Carvell</div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">United Kingdom Representative on the Governmental Advisory Committee of ICANN</div><br><div>Global Internet Governance Policy</div><div>Department for Culture, Media and Sport</div><div><a href="mailto:mark.carvell@culture.gov.uk" target="_blank">mark.carvell@culture.gov.uk</a></div><div>tel +44 (0) 20 7211 6062</div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 3 February 2016 at 09:16, Kavouss Arasteh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Jorge</div><div>Yes I agree with you.</div><div>If these two devoted calls are opened to new or old multiple proposals we will get no results</div><div>The Co-Chairs need to clarify the matter</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-03 10:10 GMT+01:00 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" target="_blank">Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="DE-CH" vlink="purple" link="blue">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">Dear Kavouss<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">I fully understand your point.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">The more reason that the co-chairs should clarify what will be discussed exactly on the Thursday and Monday calls.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">Regards<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">Jorge
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="DE" style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">Von:</span></b><span lang="DE" style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"> Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016 10:07<br>
<b>An:</b> Cancio Jorge BAKOM <<a href="mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" target="_blank">Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Thomas Rickert <<a href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net" target="_blank">thomas@rickert.net</a>>; Mathieu Weill <<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>>; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>>; <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and options to be discussed?<u></u><u></u></span></p><div><div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Jorge,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you for your message.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">You may have noted that,<strong><span style="color:red"> as participant to CCWGat call 81.</span></strong><span style="color:black">I made a compromise proposal,strictly limited to two option in Annex 11 of Rec 11,NAMELY 2/3 AND SIMPLE
MAJORITY, witzh a view to get out of dreadlocks.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Later on I have noted that after Beckie made her proposal in regard with Rec.1 ( disabling GAC in regard with exercising its community power, in case that other community innvoked IRP regading Board's action with
respect to GAC advice, claiming 8 alleging that the Board's actions exceeded it mission,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Surprisingly I have noted that those 5 persons very offen speaking of the need to exclude GAC TO EXERCISE ANY POWER AND ARE PARTISANS OF st 18 AND 50% SIMPLE MAJORITY FOR GAC ADVICE, ATTEMPTING TO COMBINE bECJKIE'S
SO-XALLED "INNOVATIVE PROPOSAL "WITH 60% .</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Last night I formally withdrew that proposal which I made as
<u>CCWG PARTICIPANT.</u></span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:black">Consequently, no proposal should be associated to me in that regard</span></u><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:black">Best wishes</span></u><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:black">Kavouss </span></u> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2016-02-03 7:01 GMT+01:00 <<a href="mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" target="_blank">Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch</a>>:<u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="border-width:medium medium medium 1pt;border-style:none none none solid;border-color:currentColor currentColor currentColor rgb(204,204,204);padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-left:4.8pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello co-chairs<br>
<br>
Could you please respond to the email below?<br>
<br>
Consultations in our constituencies are quite difficult whithout a clear process and timeline and agenda from your side.<br>
<br>
Please answer this in full and do not point to general information:<br>
<br>
<br>
We would also be grateful for an agenda, including a clear identification (and the text) of the options to be discussed, as was requested during this morning's call in the chat.<br>
<br>
thanks and regards<br>
<br>
Jorge<br>
<br>
Von meinem iPhone gesendet<br>
<br>
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail:<br>
<br>
Von: <<a href="mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" target="_blank">Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" target="_blank">Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch</a>>><br>
Datum: 2. Februar 2016 um 18:51:55 MEZ<br>
An: "<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>>" <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>>><br>
Betreff: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and options to be discussed?<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Dear co-chairs and staff<br>
<br>
Have you already sent the invites for the call on Thursday?<br>
<br>
We would also be grateful for an agenda, including a clear identification (and the text) of the options to be discussed, as was requested during this morning's call in the chat.<br>
<br>
Thanks and regards<br>
<br>
Jorge<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>