<p dir="ltr">FWIW I don't know what gives you that impression but yes no doubt about the activeness of ALAC (AtLarge) but I think adding "equal footing" to it may be too optimistic. <br>
That said, I don't think this is where to resolve that (if there is anything to resolve)</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers!</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 6 Feb 2016 9:02 p.m., "James Gannon" <<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I just want to reach to this and note that ALAC and At-Large members are very active in the GNSO policy development processes on equal footing with GNSO members. SO unless I am missing something I don’t think that this is reflective of the current realities for the GNSO policy processes.<br>
<br>
-James<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 06/02/2016, 7:37 p.m., "<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a> on behalf of Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams" <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a> on behalf of <a href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>We have struggled over the years with the problem that the GAC, and also<br>
>ALAC, have no structural means of participating in policy development (in<br>
>any of the SOs), and so are constrained to react to policy proposals.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</blockquote></div>