<html>
<body>
There are several possible reasons:<br><br>
- The Board seems to feel strongly that it would be advisable<br>
- It may well be that the "right" people to discuss a certain
issue may not be the same as those on the current CCWG. Or may not be the
ones with the interest, knowledge and time.<br>
- Better opportunity to work in parallel<br><br>
It may not happen, but if there is a will within the chartering
organizations, why should it not be allowed?<br><br>
But for the record, I was not necessarily advocating it in my reply, but
trying to ensure that if it did end up in the proposal, that it be worded
reasonably.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 06/02/2016 12:20 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font color="#002E7A">If there
is a reason for breaking the CCWG charter and taking some parts of WS 2
tasks out of the CCWG-accountability, I would like to know
it.</font><br>
<font color="#002E7A"> </font><br>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<b>Tijani BEN JEMAA<br>
</b>Executive Director<br>
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (<b>FMAI</b>)<br>
Phone: +216 98 330 114<br>
+216 52 385 114<br>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Le 5 févr. 2016 à 17:38,
Alan Greenberg
<<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>
> a écrit :<br><br>
I think that we want a chartering process comparable to that of the CCWG.
I presume that if a HR group were to come into existence and was not
chartered by a reasonable number of orgs, then the Board would not agree
to the "semi-binding" nature of the outcomes (forgive me
inventing a new word to describe the CCWG-Board process previously agreed
to).<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 05/02/2016 01:52 AM, Bruce Tonkin wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hello Alan,<br><br>
<br>
>> I don't understand the concept of a Cross Community WG
chartered by only one AC/SO.<br><br>
Good pick up. Might be best described as "two or
more", or "at least three" if you want a minimum
threshold.<br><br>
Regards,<br>
Bruce Tonkin</blockquote><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</blockquote></blockquote></body>
</html>