<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Leon, </div><div>We are almost drafting Bylawy which should be a very high level text . référence on whether the existing CCWG or another CCWG could carry out the wiorks IS THE MAXIMUM. </div><div>We do not need to enter or refer to such degree of détails.</div><div>I there is of strong believe that the part dealing with one or more SO/AC ias highlighted below is not necessary and thus should be deleted +</div><div><p align="LEFT"></p>
<font color="#ff0000" size="2"><p>"by one or more Supporting Organizations or Advisory Committees"</p><p><font color="#000000">Regards</font></p><p><font color="#000000">Kavouss </font></p></font></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-09 9:39 GMT+01:00 Bruce Tonkin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au" target="_blank">Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello Alan,<br>
<span><br>
>> I cannot see having the ICANN Bylaws refer to a specific CCWG or a sub-part thereof. If they need to make a reference such as the one we are discussing, they should say the work will be carried out by an appropriately chartered, generally/widely supported, cross community working group.<br>
<br>
</span>Makes sense to me.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Regards,<br>
Bruce Tonkin<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>