<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Agree James.<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/21/2016 10:11 AM, James Gannon
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:0A991ECE-0D88-4968-8CEE-516000D9C643@cyberinvasion.net"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div>
        <div>
          <div>My views on the fact that we need to move forward are on
            the record so I am not going to go back and re-debate that
            but I do feel the need to point out that sending multiple
            options to NTIA is not an option and I believe (Others with
            encyclopaedic memories will likely point to the source) that
            NTIA have publicly stated they expect a single solution to
            come to them for analysis.</div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>I feel that if we don’t move forward on this soon we will
        lose much of the credibility that we have build over the last 18
        months in CWG and CCWG, we are constructing our own potential
        failure here, let us not do that and move forward with the
        carefully constructed proposal that we have built, a proposal
        that no-one is happy with, which should be a sign to all parties
        that this is a hard won compromise that balances on a needle in
        terms of acceptability to all involved.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>-jg</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
        <div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:12pt;
          text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none;
          BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT:
          0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid;
          BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
          <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>&lt;<a
            moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a></a>&gt;
          on behalf of Kavouss Arasteh &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Sunday 21
          February 2016 at 10:05 a.m.<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Mathieu Weill &lt;<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr">Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr</a></a>&gt;,
          Thomas Rickert &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net">thomas@rickert.net</a>&gt;,
          León Felipe Sánchez Ambía &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>&gt;,

          "Burr, Becky" &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:Becky.Burr@neustar.biz">Becky.Burr@neustar.biz</a>&gt;,
          "<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch">Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch</a>"
          &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch">Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>CCWG Accountability
          &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re:
          [CCWG-ACCT] A message from the Co-Chairs<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <div>
            <div dir="ltr">
              <p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
                  style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt" lang="EN-US"><font
                    color="#000000" face="Calibri">Dear Co-Chairs</font></span></p>
              <p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
                  style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt" lang="EN-US"><font
                    color="#000000" face="Calibri">The number
                    Governments expressing /manifesting serious concerns
                    on the three Recommendations, 1, 2 and mainly 11 is
                    growing. Now 12 countries have formally manifest
                    their objections</font></span></p>
              <p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
                  style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt" lang="EN-US"><font
                    color="#000000" face="Calibri">These concerns are
                    focused on the manner the CCWG attempting to treat
                    GAC in an imbalance manner with respect to other
                    ICANN Constituencies .The CCWG Co- Chairs are urged
                    to explore all ways and means to <span> </span>adequately
                    respond to these   growing serious concerns taking
                    into account the long standing principle of
                    universality ,fairness and equal treatments of all
                    Multistakeholders communities in an inclusive,
                    transparent and democratic manner</font></span></p>
              <p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
                  style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt" lang="EN-US"><font
                    color="#000000" face="Calibri">We are members of one
                    family , ICANN Family , and thus deserve to be
                    <span> </span>properly, equally and fairly treated </font></span></p>
              <p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
                  style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt" lang="EN-US"><font
                    color="#000000" face="Calibri">There are still
                    opportunity /opportunities to remedy the cause of
                    these concerns</font></span></p>
              <ol style="list-style-type:decimal;direction:ltr">
                <li style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal">
                  <p
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;margin-top:0cm;margin-bottom:0pt"><span
                      style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt"
                      lang="EN-US">We may go back to call 80 on Rec 11
                      with two options of Simple Majority and 2/3 FOR
                      THE REJECTION OF GAC ADVICE BY THE BOARD and try
                      to further discus that in removing the famous
                      so-called Carve-Out which is the <span> </span>main
                      cause of some ,if not all ,of these concerns <span>
                         </span>.</span></p>
                </li>
                <li
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal">
                  <p
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;margin-top:0cm;margin-bottom:0pt"><span
                      style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt"
                      lang="EN-US">Two <span> </span>address the
                      threshold of 4 SO/AC required to recall the entire
                      Board in all cases or at least for cases in which
                      IRP is not available</span></p>
                </li>
                <li
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal">
                  <p
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;margin-top:0cm;margin-bottom:0pt"><span
                      style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt"
                      lang="EN-US">Apply the Carve-out all SOs/ACs or to
                      all ACs Treat and still discuss the threshold of 4
                      SOs / ACs for the removal of the entire Board</span></p>
                </li>
                <li
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:16pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal">
                  <p
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;margin-top:0cm;margin-bottom:0pt"><font
                      color="#ff0000"><strong><span
                          style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt"
                          lang="EN-US">Should you not succeed to find
                          compromise then submit multiple options to
                          NTIA?</span><span lang="EN-US"> </span></strong></font></p>
                </li>
              </ol>
              <div style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt 18pt"><span
                  style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt" lang="EN-US"><font
                    color="#000000" face="Calibri">Irrespective of that
                    amend Annexes 1 and 2 in regard with the adjustments
                    of the threshold if the No. of SOS &amp;ACs changed
                    in either direction and exempt the Board Recall for
                    that threshold </font></span></div>
              <div style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt 18pt"><span
                  style="line-height:115%;font-size:16pt" lang="EN-US"><font
                    color="#000000" face="Calibri">Kavouss
                  </font></span></div>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-21 9:01 GMT+01:00 <span
                  dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:epilisse@gmail.com" target="_blank">epilisse@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                  <div>
                    <div name="messageBodySection">I agree with Ed
                      Morris' request (not with his agreement :-)-O),
                      but would then also like to reopen Sole Membership
                      up revisiting.<br>
                      <br>
                      In any case let me place the current state on the
                      record:<br>
                      <br>
                      Our proposal is so complicated that we do not
                      understand it ourselves, or (rather) remember what
                      we agreed on a week ago exactly.<br>
                      <br>
                      But the negotiation tactics of Board and GAC have
                      us worn down so that it doesn't matter what we
                      agreed upon, just ship something (anything rather)
                      and be done with it.<br>
                      <br>
                      These are well known, classical negotiation
                      tactics, by experienced professional negotiators,
                      dealing with multilateral negotiations for a
                      living.<br>
                      <br>
                      Besides that, I put the blame for this straight at
                      the dysfunctional (and very quiet) co-chairs who,
                      I feel, should have some form of recall of what we
                      had Consensus on (not Full Consensus :-)-O) a week
                      ago, and put the foot down about these tactics,
                      for example have the Board members participating
                      object and add minority statement.<br>
                      <br>
                      In any case, if we are going the route of
                      reopening our Final Report to anything but
                      increasing Consensus, I demand the right to update
                      my Minority Statement and we need a new time line.<br>
                      <br>
                      Come to think about it, write it up, add that we
                      have no Consensus, but that this is what we got by
                      way of self imposed time lime, and let the
                      Chartering Organizations sort out this mess.<br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      el</div>
                    <div name="messageSignatureSection"><br>
                      --<br>
                      Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad 4 mini</div>
                    <span>
                      <div name="messageReplySection"><br>
                        On 21 Feb 2016, 02:33 +0200, Edward Morris &lt;<a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net"
                          target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net">egmorris1@toast.net</a></a>&gt;,
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote type="cite"><span
                            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif;font-size:12px"></span>
                          <div><span
                              style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif;font-size:12px">+2
                              - with the additional caveat that if the
                              compromise we have is to be extinguished,
                              those of us who were willing to agree to
                              the carve out rather than insist that the
                              GAC make a choice between advisor and
                              participant are free to return to our
                              former positions.  </span></div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                    </span></div>
                  <br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
                    target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </span>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 

Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy &amp; Human Rights Project
Center for Democracy &amp; Technology | cdt.org
E: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a> | T: +44.771.247.2987

CDT's Annual Dinner, Tech Prom, is April 6, 2016. Don't miss out - register at cdt.org/annual-dinner.</pre>
  
 <br />
 <table style="border-top: 1px solid #aaabb6;">
        <tr>
                <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 20px; color: #41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. <br /><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email" target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com</a>
                </td>
        </tr>
 </table>
</body>
</html>