<div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">Dear Co-chair,</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">I wish to express full support for the course of action that was taken
by the chair and congratulate you for your, neutrality, impartiality and
frankness.</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">You did a formidable ruling.</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">Do not be afraid of any criticism what so ever,</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">Those
statistics contained in your analysis is a clear example of support to your ruling.</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">There is no
absolute satisfaction .The issue was extremely delicate and sensitive and
properly handled</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">Thanks </span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">Well-done</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-size:14pt">Kavouss <span> </span></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-23 19:28 GMT+01:00 Seun Ojedeji <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Thanks for this and I like to congratulate the co-chairs and everyone that participated in this process. It&#39;s good to read the section below:</p><span>
<p dir="ltr">&quot;<b>We will now proceed and send the finalized report, without (2), to the Chartering </b><b>Organizations</b><b> for approval</b>&quot;</p>
</span><p dir="ltr">That is one major hurdle that has been crossed in this process.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On 23 Feb 2016 7:14 p.m., &quot;Thomas Rickert&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net" target="_blank">thomas@rickert.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br type="attribution"></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><div><div class="h5"><div style="-ms-word-wrap: break-word;">














<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">All,</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Several of you have raised
questions and concerns about the process used for coming to a conclusion on the
language in Annex 2. We have explained why we have given the CCWG the
opportunity to express views on the various inputs that we received, reflect on
the potential consequences and discuss a way forward. For those interested in the
details, we would kindly refer you to the </span><span lang="EN-CA"><a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58721088" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">recording
and transcript</span></a></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">The fact is that concerns with
the language in Annex 2 have not only been expressed by the Board, so we would
urge everyone to consult the publicly archived mailing list as well as the mp3
and transcript of the call earlier today. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">We understand and share the
view that work in the CCWG has been, and still is, exhausting and not as
straightforward or predictable as one would hope. However, work in this
CCWG is not like work on projects in a commercial environment – the journey to
consensus is painful, lengthy and, yes, it takes detours. Stumbling
forward characterizes the multi-stakeholder model and has been part of our work
for the past 14 months. I guess we would all have hoped that there are no bumps
during the last mile, but that is just how our group functions at times. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">We would like to congratulate
and thank all of you for expressing your views on this matter. Hearing all views,
particularly those that are controversial, adds to the credibility of the
product of our work because this allowed all colleagues on the calls to make an
informed decision on how to proceed.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">On the call, we suggested looking
at two alternatives, both of which have been thoroughly discussed. We then
proceeded to polling and allowed everyone on the call to chime in. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">There has been a debate on the
list subsequently about who could participate in the poll and who could
not. You will remember that we clarified that, while everyone could join
the poll, an analysis of the results would be conducted after the call. Yet, we
wanted to collect all &quot;raw data&quot; at the time of the call. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><b><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">We have now taken a look at the outcome of the poll and confirm that -
focusing on members and participants only and focusing on members in particular
- we have broad support for removal of the language in (2).</span></b><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> A statistical analysis can be found below in this e-mail. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">As such, the updated Paragraph
72 language is:<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><div style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;line-height:normal;background-color:white"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">The CCWG-Accountability also recommends that in a
situation where the GAC may not participate as a Decisional Participant because
the Community Power is proposed to be used to challenge the Board’s
implementation of GAC consensus advice and the threshold is set at four in
support, the power will still be validly exercised if three are in support and
no more than one objects, with the following exception:<u></u><u></u></span></div><div style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;line-height:normal;background-color:white"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></div><div style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;line-height:normal;background-color:white"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Where the power to be exercised is recalling the
entire Board for implementing GAC advice, the reduced threshold would apply
only </span><s><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:red;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">either</span></s><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> after an IRP has found that, in implementing
GAC advice, the Board acted inconsistently with the ICANN Bylaws<s>,</s></span><s><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:red;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> or</span></s><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></div><div style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt 72pt;line-height:normal;background-color:white"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:red;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">(1)</span><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:red;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:7pt"> </span><s><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:red;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">if the IRP is not available to challenge the Board action in question</span></s><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">.  <u></u><u></u></span></div><div style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;line-height:normal;background-color:white"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></div><div style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;line-height:normal;background-color:white"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">If the Empowered Community has brought such an
IRP and does not prevail, the Empowered Community may not exercise its
power to recall the entire the Board solely on the basis of the matter
decided by the IRP. It may, however, exercise that power based on other
grounds.<u></u><u></u></span></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">The discussion has shown that
parts of the group have opted for this way forward after thorough discussion of
all consequences of what we had in our report. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Some of you might be
disappointed with this, but please remember that we always aimed to be as
inclusive as possible and to work as consensus-driven as possible while coming
to closure as quickly as feasible. That is the co-Chairs&#39; mandate.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Today, the CCWG had the
opportunity to choose the option to ship the report in its 19 February draft
version. It was in the CCWG&#39;s hands to ignore the issue that was raised by the
Board and supported by others. The CCWG has chosen to take a different
approach and the co-Chairs certainly cannot ignore the CCWG&#39;s wishes. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">One final point: Some on the
email list have asked questions about decision thresholds if the number of
decisional participants in the Empowered Community changes from the expected
five SOs/ACs. We draw your attention to the text in Paragraphs 73 and 74 of
Annex 2 in the 19 February draft. This text explicitly notes that any change in
the number of decisional participants would lead to a reconsideration of the
thresholds. A simple understanding of this is that if the number of decisional
participants falls, so will the required level of support for those powers that
today require 4 SOs/ACs to support their use. This is not changed by the
decisions made today about para 72.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><b><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">We will now proceed and send the finalized report, without (2), to the
Chartering Organizations for approval.<u></u><u></u></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Thank you,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:5pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Thomas for León and Mathieu (who is
on leave)<u></u><u></u></span></p>

<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"><br clear="all">
</span><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:5pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:14pt">Results of
polling from February 23<sup>rd</sup> 2016 call of the CCWG-Accountability<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Analysis on the 4 questions with 56 casting
votes from the CCWG call of February 23rd:<u></u><u></u></span></p><p><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:Symbol;font-size:12pt">·<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">     
</span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Members<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">ALAC
– all 5 present<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">ASO
– 2 of 4 present<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">ccNSO
– 3 of 5 present<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">GAC
– 4 of 5 present<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">gNSO
– 5 OF 5 present<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">SSAC
– none of 2 present<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Total
present 19 of 26 or 70%<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:Symbol;font-size:12pt">·<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">     
</span></span><b><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Poll
#1 – Who objects to removing the 2nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in red on the
slide), (“If the IRP is not available to challenge the Board action in
question”)?<u></u><u></u></span></b></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">11
of 56 = 20% total<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">2
of 19 Members = 11%, 2 of 26 = 8%<u></u><u></u></span></p><p><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:Symbol;font-size:12pt">·<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">     
</span></span><b><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Poll
#2 – Who objects to sending the report forward (to Chartering Organizations) as
it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with the full text in Paragraph
72)?<u></u><u></u></span></b></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">30
of 56 = 54% total<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">8
of 19 Members = 42%, 8 of 26 = 32%<u></u><u></u></span></p><p><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:Symbol;font-size:12pt">·<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">     
</span></span><b><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Poll
#3 – Who supports removing the language in the 2nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in
red on the slide), (“If the IRP is not available to challenge the Board action
in question”)?<u></u><u></u></span></b></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">38
of 56 = 68% total<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">11
of 19 Members = 58%, 11 of 26 = 42%<u></u><u></u></span></p><p><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:Symbol;font-size:12pt">·<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">     
</span></span><b><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">Poll
#4 – Who supports sending the report to Chartering Organizations as it is
currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with the full text in Paragraph 72)?<u></u><u></u></span></b></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">14
of 56 = 25% total<u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-left:72pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Courier New&quot;;font-size:12pt">o<span style="line-height:normal;font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;font-size:7pt">   </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt">2
of 19 Members = 11%, 2 of 26 = 8%<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;line-height:normal;margin-bottom:5pt"><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;;font-size:12pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><br></p></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>