<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<!-- Template generated by Exclaimer Mail Disclaimers on 09:30:08 Wednesday, 24 February 2016 --><style type="text/css">P.90ee7c49-625a-40f7-a446-19f7d81ef5de {
        MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
LI.90ee7c49-625a-40f7-a446-19f7d81ef5de {
        MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
DIV.90ee7c49-625a-40f7-a446-19f7d81ef5de {
        MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
TABLE.90ee7c49-625a-40f7-a446-19f7d81ef5deTable {
        MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
DIV.Section1 {
        page: Section1
}
</style>
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0in;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:8.0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
        {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<p class="90ee7c49-625a-40f7-a446-19f7d81ef5de"></p>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">Yes, agree fully.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"> accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Edward Morris<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:11 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Jordan Carter; Salaets, Ken<br>
<b>Cc:</b> accountability-cross-community@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Regarding what happens if fewer than five o f ICANNâ?Ts SOs and ACs agree to be Decisional Participants in the Empowered Community<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Well said. Completely agree.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">
<hr size="2" width="100%" align="center">
</span></div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">From</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">: &quot;Salaets, Ken&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:ksalaets@itic.org">ksalaets@itic.org</a>&gt;<br>
<b>Sent</b>: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:09 PM<br>
<b>To</b>: &quot;Jordan Carter&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>&gt;<br>
<b>Cc</b>: &quot;<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
<b>Subject</b>: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Regarding what happens if fewer than five o f ICANN’s SOs and ACs agree to be Decisional Participants in the Empowered Community</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">This is territory that has been covered time and again, but it should be clear to everyone that we still do not have agreement or, perhaps more accurately, the requisite commitments
 from all parties. &nbsp;Without such, we are being set up for future debates, frustrations and misunderstandings that, if past is indeed prologue, will lead to further marginalization of the accountability objectives that we initially established for this process.
 &nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">If a clear, solid agreement doesn't get locked into place now, it will never get locked into place, and those who have never truly bought into the notion that additional accountability
 is essential or desirable will continue to walk us back.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">It was suggested earlier that those who have expressed frustrations with this activity perhaps don't understand how international negotiations work and what's required to reach
 an agreement. After spending 15-plus years engaging in negotiations of various sorts globally, I understand completely. &nbsp;When those leading a process are perceived to place higher priority on &nbsp;arbitrary deadlines or achieving any semblance of an agreement
 for agreement's sake, the outcome will be unbalanced and the opportunity missed.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">It is essential that clear, concise language on how and when thresholds are to be adjusted be explicitly included in any final agreement and via corresponding amendments to
 ICANN's governing documents. &nbsp;All parties should be willing to agree to this. &nbsp;If not, then it would be wise to question what exactly has been achieved via this latest round of concessions. &nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Happy Wednesday.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Ken<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"><br>
</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<p class="90ee7c49-625a-40f7-a446-19f7d81ef5de"></p>
<hr align="left" color="#58595b" width="200">
<span style="font-size:x-small; color: #004B8D; font-weight: bold; ">Brett</span><span style="font-size:x-small; color: #004B8D; font-weight: bold; "></span>
<span style="font-size:x-small; color: #004B8D; font-weight: bold; ">Schaefer</span><span style="font-size:x-small; color: #58595B; font-weight: normal; font-style: italic; "><br>
Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs</span><span style="font-size:x-small; color: #58595B; font-weight: normal; font-style: italic; "></span><span style="font-size:x-small; color: #58595B; font-weight: normal; font-style: italic; "><br>
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy</span><br>
<font color="#58595b" size="2">The Heritage Foundation<br>
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE<br>
Washington, DC 20002</font><span style="font-size:x-small; color: #58595B; "><br>
202-608-6097</span><br>
<font color="#004b8d" size="2"><a style="COLOR: #004b8d; TEXT-DECORATION: none" href="http://heritage.org/">heritage.org</a><br>
<span style="font-size:x-small; "></span><span style="font-size:x-small; "></span>
<p></p>
</font>
<p></p>
<div class="WordSection1">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">On Feb 24, 2016, at 1:36 AM, Jordan Carter &lt;<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">I am saying that if we write bylaws that have four decisional participants, those bylaws won't have thresholds of four to exercise any community power. That is very clearly
 the intent of our work to date. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">So if we find out - possibly through the ratification process for the proposal - that anyone declines to participate who we have assumed will (or those who have said they will
 not, change their minds), then we have to revisit the thresholds.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">We have plenty of chance to do that, because all of the bylaws changes require full community consultation and debate etc.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">I would not want anyone to be mistaken about the importance of getting this right. I will certainly strongly&nbsp;advocate that this proposal be rejected by the ccNSO if there is
 *any* prospect of general powers requiring unanimity.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Best<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Jordan&nbsp;<br>
<br>
On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, Alan Greenberg &lt;<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>&gt; wrote:
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">The Bylaws governing such thresholds are part of the Empowered Community creation and thus Fundamental Bylaws. They will require the approval of the Empowered Community to change.<br>
<br>
Alan<br>
<br>
At 24/02/2016 12:55 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:<br>
&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">That's fine Jordan, but just to be clear, such change(reduction/increase in threshold as applicable) will only occur when the community come together to agree again right? i.e
 the current CCWG proposal does not say if the &quot;empowered community&quot; becomes 4, then the thresholds automatically reduces. I hope that is not what you are communicating.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
On 24 Feb 2016 06:22, &quot;Jordan Carter&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz%20">jordan@internetnz.net.nz
</a>&gt; wrote: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Seun, all,<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">If there are 4 decisional SOs/ACs instead of 5, then the thresholds all need to change.<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">The ones that currently have a threshold of 4 would then require unanimity.<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">That would be totally unacceptable. It is not consistent with our work to date or with our report. The report specifically notes that a change from
 5 eligible decisional participants leads to threshold changes for this very reason.<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Best<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Jordan<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, Seun Ojedeji &lt;<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com%20">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com
</a>&gt; wrote: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">I believe this makes sense and can be noted during implementation. However, IMO a reduction of participating SO/AC in the &quot;empowered community&quot; from
 5 to 4 should not cause any need for change since none of the exercise of community powers requires more than a threshold 4 and considering that 4 still represents over 50%(4/7) of the ICANN community we should be fine. So the current threshold proposed from
 paragraph 25 to 47 on Annex 2 could still be maintained (ofcourse without any reduction)<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">However anything that goes below 4, I expect would make the model impractical and require a complete overhaul.<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">On 24 Feb 2016 04:39, &quot;Bruce Tonkin&quot; &lt;<a href="http://??" target="_blank">Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au</a>&gt;
 wrote: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Hello All,<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">In response to the question from Brett Schaefer:<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&gt;&gt;&nbsp; I would hope that we could get explicit clarification and commitment from the Board that, if the GAC cannot decide or chooses not to become a decisional
 participant, that the Board would support lowering the thresholds for exercising all EC powers to avoid the requirement for SOAC unanimous support to exercise those powers.<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">The Board supports the language in the report, at Page 72 of Annex 2:<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">“The thresholds presented in this document were determined based on this assessment.&nbsp; If fewer than five of ICANN’s SOs and ACs agree to be Decisional
 Participants, these thresholds for consensus support may be adjusted.&nbsp; Thresholds would also have to be adjusted if ICANN changes to have more SOs or ACs.â€<br>
<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">The Board’s earlier comment on this issue from Page 5 of our 14 December 2015 Comments to the Third Draft Proposal from the CCWG is as follows:<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&quot;B. Board Comments and Supporting Rationale on Further Defining Thresholds<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">The thresholds as set out in the Proposal (Pages 22-23) seem well defined for the design of ICANN today.&nbsp; The Board would not support lowering of any
 of these thresholds because these community powers represent the voice of the ICANN community.&nbsp; A reduction of the threshold could risk that a decision does not reflect the community’s will.<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">While the thresholds seem well defined for the design of ICANN today, the Board recommends further defining the thresholds for exercising community
 powers in the event that the number of SOs or ACs change.&nbsp; Leaving this issue for future consideration raises the potential for renegotiation of the community thresholds.&nbsp;&nbsp; This potential for renegotiation adds a level of instability and a lack of predictability.&nbsp;&nbsp;
 As a result, the Board recommends (1) clarifying that the thresholds identified in the Proposal are based on the current structure; and (2) identifying the percentages that will be applied in the event that there is a change in the number of SOs or ACs in
 the future.&quot;<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">When we previously discussed this with the CCWG, we understood from Page 72 of Annex 2 that the CCWG does not want to set percentages and has agreed
 to revisit the thresholds if the number of participants change.<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">We will further discuss this issue when it becomes clear who the future participants will be, and whether fewer than five of ICANN’s SOs and ACs agree
 to be Decisional Participants in the Empowered Community.<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Bruce Tonkin<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"><a href="http://??" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">--<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Jordan Carter<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Chief Executive, InternetNZ<br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"><a href="tel:%2B64-21-442-649" target="_blank">&#43;64-21-442-649</a> |
<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a><br>
&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Sent on the run, apologies for brevity<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Jordan Carter<br>
Chief Executive, InternetNZ <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&#43;64-21-442-649 |
<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">Sent on the run, apologies for brevity<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<p></p>
</body>
</html>