<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I can state with absolute truthfulness and certainty that there was no pre-alignment or pre-arrangement. I resent the allegation and I'm disappointed in the thinking underlying such a statement.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">People agreed with me because they shared my opinion, which is not in any way intended to be US-centric. If this were a UK-law document, I would say the same thing -- that we should use terms commonly used and with settled meanings under UK law. I think it's a common sense position.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Can we get back to business and avoid hatching conspiracy theories? Such thinking is below the standard set by my esteemed colleague from Iran.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg 😈</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:54 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Dear Kavouss,<div><br></div><div>I cannot jump into concluding that there is any kind of pre-arrangement against your views.</div><div><br></div><div>The fact that as you state “others had no comments” was what led me to believe there was no traction to the issue and hence I suggested taking it to the list.</div><div><br></div><div><br><div>
<div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>León</div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>El 12/04/2016, a las 8:51 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> escribió:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr">Dear Leon<div>Tks</div><div>Having no traction was due to lineup ?pre arrangement of those talked against me </div><div>Others had no comments</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-04-12 15:40 GMT+02:00 León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear Kavouss,<br>
<br>
I am sorry you feel that way. As you know, our duty as Co-Chairs is to try to facilitate the discussion amongst all members and participants in our group.<br>
<br>
I am aware that you have expressed your disagreement with Mr. Shatan’s views in several occasions but I am also aware that, to the best of my knowledge, your disagreement has found no traction in the discussion in the meeting you are referring to, hence I thought the best way to foster and encourage discussion on the issue was to take it to the list.<br>
<br>
I apologize if my suggestion offended you or if it was perceived as being disrespectful. Of course I didn’t mean it that way at all.<br>
<br>
I trust you will understand why I suggested to take the discussion to the list and thank you for your kind observation.<br>
<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
<br>
León<br>
<div><div><br>
> El 12/04/2016, a las 6:54 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> escribió:<br>
><br>
> Dear Leon<br>
> I am disappointed and frustrated by the reaction of some Co-Chairs in conducting the meeting .<br>
> I had a disagreement with Mr. Satan of IPC on the above subject<br>
> Due to the closed link between that person and other persons belonging to the same camp, you did not agreed with the argument that I submitted .<br>
> Mr.Satan and his camp , wrong views were taken BUT what disturbed me more was your statement in saying" kavouss,if you want to continue thus discussion,continue on nailing list"<br>
> Why should I do that?<br>
> What was the usefulness of the meeting if an important issue should be discussed outside the call?<br>
> Why I was treated ?<br>
> .<br>
> Kavousd<br>
> Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>