<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Garamond;
panose-1:2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 8 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.hoenzb
{mso-style-name:hoenzb;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>I don’t think we can “change the report” now … indeed, the entire scope of the argument we had earlier was that we could NOT insert anything new into the report because it had already been completed and approved by the chartering organizations and the only thing left was implementation.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>I have no opinion on the merits of Greg’s language and whether it is the right thing to do broadly considered – but on process grounds it really cannot be acceptable to redraft language in a way that is “new” and a “change” from our accepted report.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Or, if it is, then I want to go back and talk about the GAC again </span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Wingdings'>J</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Paul<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Paul Rosenzweig<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><a href="mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com"><span style='color:#0563C1'>paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>O: +1 (202) 547-0660<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>M: +1 (202) 329-9650<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><a href="http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/"><span style='color:#0563C1'>www.redbranchconsulting.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><a href="http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9"><span style='color:#0563C1'>My PGP Key</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Seun Ojedeji<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, April 26, 2016 7:30 AM<br><b>To:</b> Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com><br><b>Cc:</b> Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com>; ICANN@adlercolvin.com; accountability-cross-community@icann.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CCWG-ACCT] inconsistency in bylaws spotted<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>FWIW what Greg proposed is not inline with the text in the report. However if there is consensus (based on CCWG charter) to change the report that was already submitted in the manner proposed then i am fine with it as well.<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal>Regards<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>Holly and All,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>I'm concerned that by reverting to the language in the Proposal, we are perpetuating the language that led to confusion in the first place. It should be clear that this is a "business as usual" process of Chartering Organization review of a CCWG-Accountability consensus recommendations, just as was done with the Proposal. i would suggest adding the following clarifying language:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>“(a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall have no force or effect unless and until a framework of interpretation for human rights (“FOI-HR”) is approved by (i) the CCWG-Accountability as a consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2 <i><u>(including Chartering Organizations’ approval </u></i></span><b><i><u><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:red'>as set forth in the CCWG-Accountability Charter</span></u></i></b><i><u><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>), and </span></u></i><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> (ii) <s>each of the CCWG-Accountability’s chartering organizations and (iii)</s> the Board (in the case of the Board, using the same process and criteria used by the Board to consider the Work Stream 1 Recommendations).”</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>I look forward to your thoughts.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#888888'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#888888'>Greg<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Gregory, Holly <<a href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com" target="_blank">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Dear CCWG-Accountability, </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>We have been following this email stream and in re-reading the language of the Bylaws we understand how the language could be misread to call for a standard higher than what is intended. Therefore we propose that a clarification would be helpful. Specifically, to remove any confusion and help assure that the Bylaws are read in a manner that is consistent with the proposal, we recommend the following clarifying change to Section 27.3: </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>“(a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall have no force or effect unless and until a framework of interpretation for human rights (“FOI-HR”) is approved by (i) the CCWG-Accountability as a consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2 <i><u>(including Chartering Organizations’ approval), and </u></i> (ii) <s>each of the CCWG-Accountability’s chartering organizations and (iii)</s> the Board (in the case of the Board, using the same process and criteria used by the Board to consider the Work Stream 1 Recommendations).” </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>If you agree, we recommend that you include this in the CCWG’s public comment. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Kind regards, </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Holly </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>HOLLY</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> <b>J. GREGORY</b></span><span style='color:#1F497D'><br></span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Partner and Co-Chair<br>Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Sidley Austin LLP</span></b><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><br>787 Seventh Avenue<br>New York, NY 10019<br><a href="tel:%2B1%20212%20839%205853" target="_blank">+1 212 839 5853</a></span><span style='color:#1F497D'><br></span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><a href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com" target="_blank" title="Click to send email to Gregory, Holly">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a></span><span style='color:#1F497D'><br><a href="http://www.sidley.com/" target="_blank" title=www.sidley.com><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>www.sidley.com</span></a></span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><a href="http://www.sidley.com/" target="_blank"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;text-decoration:none'><img border=0 width=35 height=35 style='width:.3666in;height:.3666in' id="_x0000_i1025" src="http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png" alt="http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png"></span></a><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> <b>SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP</b></span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'> <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>McAuley, David<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, April 25, 2016 2:12 PM<br><b>To:</b> Dr. Tatiana Tropina; <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a></span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CCWG-ACCT] inconsistency in bylaws spotted<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'> <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>In my personal opinion, I think Tatiana was correct in observing that there can be different interpretations in this respect. <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'> <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>I respectfully don’t think we can now say that decision making regarding the FoI in WS2 is simply based on the charter. The charter set WS1 in motion and in WS1 we specifically agreed that the HR bylaw will not enter into force until, among other things, an FoI is developed as a consensus WS2 recommendation “(including Chartering Organizations’ approval)” – we cannot delete that quoted bylaw language as it means something. <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'> <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>Here is what the draft bylaw-language in the proposal provides:<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'> <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>“Within its Core Values, ICANN will commit to respect internationally recognized Human Rights as required by applicable law. This provision does not create any additional obligation for ICANN to respond to or consider any complaint, request, or demand seeking the enforcement of Human Rights by ICANN. This Bylaw provision will not enter into force until (1) a Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights (FOI-HR) is developed by the CCWG-Accountability as a consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2 (including Chartering Organizations’ approval) and (2) the FOI-HR is approved by the ICANN Board using the same process and criteria it has committed to use to consider the Work Stream 1 recommendations.”<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'> <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>If that requires further clarity it seems to me that it will need to be developed in WS2 given that our charge now is to see if the bylaws draft tracks the final proposal. In this respect it appears to do so.<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'> <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>David McAuley<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'> <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Dr. Tatiana Tropina<br><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, April 24, 2016 4:42 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CCWG-ACCT] inconsistency in bylaws spotted</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in'>Hi all,<br>I certainly understand that there can be different interpretations of the intent of the report. <br><br>The item (ii) of the bylaw in the report says: "<b>consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2 </b>(including Chartering Organizations’ approval)". <br><br>We have even have different thresholds for consensus in the report itself, which one is applicable here? What is the process for reaching this consensus? The same as for WS1? Then we might need a reference to WS1 may be? Furthermore: will everything developed in the WS2 require a full consensus and approval of all COs? I read the chapter in the bylaws about WS2 and it refers to the process and charter of WS1. No requirement for full consensus or approval of the all the COs there. Why does not HR bylaw refer to the previous section in the bylaw that specifically outlines the requirements for Ws, but introduces the approval of all COs instead? I don't mind this, but the clarification seems to be necessary. <br><br>Is there already a definition of consensus for the purpose of the WS2 and if yes, is it the same that has been introduced for HR FOI in HR bylaw text? This is my question. <br><br>If the answer is "yes" - then there is no inconsistency. However, I agree with Niels that this should be clarified, so we all will be on the same page. <br><br>Cheers<br>Tanya <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'>On 24/04/16 20:44, Seun Ojedeji wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p style='margin-left:.5in'>Hi,<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>Are you saying that the bylaw text is different from the intent of the report as I don't think that is the case. The report indeed required approval of the CO which was rightly reflected as item ii in the bylaw text.<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>I therefore think the bylaw text is consistent with the intent of the report.<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>Regards<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:.5in'>Sent from my LG G4<br>Kindly excuse brevity and typos<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'>On 24 Apr 2016 7:01 p.m., "Niels ten Oever" <<a href="mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net" target="_blank">lists@nielstenoever.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'><br>Dear all,<br><br>I hope this email finds you well. Upon re-reading the bylaw text I came<br>across the following issue which does not seem to be in accordance with<br>what we agreed in WS1.<br><br>The CCWG report says where it comes to Human Rights:<br><br>[ccwg report]<br><br> “Within its Core Values, ICANN will commit to respect internationally<br>recognized<br> Human Rights as required by applicable law. This provision does not<br>create any<br> additional obligation for ICANN to respond to or consider any<br>complaint, request,<br> or demand seeking the enforcement of Human Rights by ICANN. This Bylaw<br> provision will not enter into force until (1) a Framework of<br>Interpretation for Human<br> Rights (FOI-HR) is developed by the CCWG-Accountability as a consensus<br> recommendation in Work Stream 2 (including Chartering Organizations’<br>approval)<br> and (2) the FOI-HR is approved by the ICANN Board using the same<br>process and<br><br>criteria it has committed to use to consider the Work Stream 1<br>recommendations.”<br><br>[/ccwg report]<br><br>But when I look at the bylaw text it says:<br><br>[proposed bylaw]<br><br>The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall have no force or<br>effect unless and until a framework of interpretation for human rights<br>(“FOI-HR”) is approved by (i) the CCWG-Accountability as a consensus<br>recommendation in Work Stream 2, (ii) each of the CCWG-Accountability’s<br>chartering organizations and (iii) the Board (in the case of the Board,<br>using the same process and criteria used by the Board to consider the<br>Work Stream 1 Recommendations).<br><br>[/proposed bylaw]<br><br>Now it is explicitly required that all Chartering Organizations approve<br>the Framework of Interpretation, whereas during WS1 it was agreed that<br>for WS2 we would use exactly the same process of approval as for WS1.<br><br>What makes this even more divergent is that this clause is only added<br>for Human Rights in the proposed bylaws and not for any other bylaw.<br>Whereas there was no exceptional procedure for human rights discussed<br>for WS2.<br><br>What I propose is to refer to the charter of the CCWG on Accountability<br>for the decision making of all processes in WS2 (including the decision<br>making on the FoI on Human Rights) and not create separate or new<br>requirements or processes.<br><br>All the best,<br><br>Niels<br><br><br><br>--<br>Niels ten Oever<br>Head of Digital<br><br>Article 19<br><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.article19.org&d=CwMFAg&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=CW0HijJt950Jj0TnSs0Uu9zc0aeHn-COr3a24oHd6IM&s=NcvlJyYsf1dukFULmFMt12-UJRg0HtYLbYCN8XiVDjo&e=" target="_blank">www.article19.org</a><br><br>PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4<br> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9<br>_______________________________________________<br>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFAg&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=CW0HijJt950Jj0TnSs0Uu9zc0aeHn-COr3a24oHd6IM&s=Ke7m0Wc1WOPvT-zpltBPQ4xvdcoE_ZdB2l0cdHhY7go&e=" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><o:p> </o:p></p><pre style='margin-left:.5in'>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:.5in'>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:.5in'><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:.5in'><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFAg&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=CW0HijJt950Jj0TnSs0Uu9zc0aeHn-COr3a24oHd6IM&s=Ke7m0Wc1WOPvT-zpltBPQ4xvdcoE_ZdB2l0cdHhY7go&e=" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in'> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div><p> <o:p></o:p></p><p>****************************************************************************************************<br>This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.<br>If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us<br>immediately.<br><br>****************************************************************************************************<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>_______________________________________________<br>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>_______________________________________________<br>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br clear=all><br>-- <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>------------------------------------------------------------------------<span style='color:#888888'><o:p></o:p></span></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><i><span style='font-family:"Garamond",serif;color:#006600'>Seun Ojedeji,<br>Federal University Oye-Ekiti<br>web: </span></i><i><span style='font-family:"Garamond",serif;color:#888888'><a href="http://www.fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">http://www.fuoye.edu.ng</a><br></span></i><i><span style='font-family:"Garamond",serif;color:#006600'>Mobile: +2348035233535</span></i><i><span style='font-family:"Garamond",serif;color:#888888'><br></span></i><i><span style='font-family:"Garamond",serif;color:#006600'>alt email:<a href="http://goog_1872880453" target="_blank"> </a><a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng</a></span></i><span style='font-family:"Garamond",serif;color:#888888'><o:p></o:p></span></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Garamond",serif;color:#888888'>Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!<o:p></o:p></span></p></blockquote></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>