<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">That's why I've suggested the bylaws text be fixed....</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com" target="_blank">ajs@anvilwalrusden.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:46PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
> I've replied to this point on the original thread. In short, my proposal<br>
> does not change the report. If anything, the current proposed bylaws text<br>
> changes the report by implying that a higher level of approval for the FOI<br>
> was intended, when that was not the intent of the group or the proposal.<br>
<br>
</span>In which case, the bylaw text needs to be fixed, which was my main<br>
point. I think that's the key: that there be exact alignment between<br>
the report and what the bylaws say, even if we conclude now that the<br>
resulting bylaw has side effects we don't like.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
A<br>
<br>
--<br>
Andrew Sullivan<br>
<a href="mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com">ajs@anvilwalrusden.com</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>