<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
+1 to Greg.<br>
<br>
I'm certain that there will be no such statement or intent to
require the high standard of approval for FoI (I keep repeating this
again and again). I think - if necessary - one can even try to find
the transcripts of the calls, where we always referred to the same
process for FOI as for WS1. <br>
We wouldn't even have got this discussions if there were no
inconsistency in the bylaw drafting, so I am even a bit surprised
how the issue that has never been even discussed (the requirement
for full approval) out of sudden is being debated as something that
we could ever "say" or "write". <br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
Tanya <br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/16 22:20, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+aOHUTFJtvVqeB1DCC9NkmJjujbO9z2GE22+912FaqMZnRk7Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I am also referring to
what we [said/wrote]* in the report, which is the following:</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">"The
proposed draft Bylaw also clarifies that no IRP challenges
can be made on the grounds of this Bylaw until a Framework
of Interpretation on Human Rights (</span><span class=""
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">FOI</span><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">-HR)
is developed and approved as part of Work Stream 2
activities. It further clarifies that <b>acceptance of the </b></span><span
class=""
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><b>FOI</b></span><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><b>-HR
will require the same process as for Work Stream 1
recommendations</b> (as agreed for all Work Stream 2
recommendations)."</span><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><br>
</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">We
said ... er sorry .. wrote this <b><u>three</u></b> times
in the report, and we need to give this effect. The
language in the draft circulated for comment is inconsistent
with this statement, to the extent that it appears to
require the positive approval of all Chartering
Organizations, which would be a <u>different</u> process
than the one used for Work Stream 1 recommendations. As
such, the draft needs to be corrected.</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><br>
</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">I
was on the calls and email exchanges when the parenthetical
about the chartering organizations was inserted in the
"bylaws" language in the Proposal. All that was meant by
the insertion was to clarify that the FoI did not go
straight from Working Group approval to the Board, but had
to be reviewed by the Chartering Organizations first, just
as the WS1 recommendations were reviewed. There was never
any discussion or intent to imply that a higher standard of
approval was needed for the FoI vs. all other CCWG
recommendations. </span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><br>
</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">If
anyone can find a clear and unequivocal statement that shows
the CCWG meant to have a heightened standard for the FoI,
I'll reconsider my view. However, I'm confident there is no
such statement. We spent many, many hours of discussing and
drafting sections on levels of approval for the Empowered
Community and relating to levels of approval within the
GAC. As such, it defies logic to claim that the simple
insertion of a parenthetical, without any specific
discussion or explanation of a heightened standard, created
a requirement for unanimous and/or positive approval.</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><br>
</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">Greg</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><br>
</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">______</span></div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">*
You are inventing a dichotomy where there is none. In
either case, I was referring to the report, not to some
verbal utterance. I'm sorry if my somewhat colloquial use
of "said" confused you. It's perfectly acceptable to use
"said" to refer to a written document, at least in everyday
usage.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Seun
Ojedeji <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">Depends on how you are interpreting the word
"bundle"; the WS1 was presented as a single document,
while some COs decided to approve/respond recommendation
by recommendation, others approved the document as a
whole. Perhaps a simple application of the report(if you
want to avoid round trips proposed in the report without
distorting the intent) will be to highlight FoI as a
single recommendation in WS2 which gives the COs the
option to approve/reject it out rightly and then the CCWG
can determine what to do with the FoI based on the outcome
of the COs approval process.</p>
<p dir="ltr">On your second point, at this juncture I am not
talking about what we said but rather about what we WROTE
in the report, which is what anyone who have not followed
the process would rely upon. So do you want to reflect
"what we said" or "what we wrote" either of them is fine
by me but we should be clear on the path we have chosen,
knowing it's implications as well.</p>
<span class="im HOEnZb">
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<p dir="ltr">Sent from my LG G4<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos</p>
</span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote">On 2 May 2016 3:51 p.m., "Greg
Shatan" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"
target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">At no
point did we say that the FoI would be bundled
with other WS2 recommendations as a complete
package. Indeed, we've never said that any of
the WS2 projects had to be bundled with others.</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">At no
point did we say that there would be a special
process for approving the FoI. It should be the
same as WS1, which contemplates a review by the
Chartering Organizations, and then allows the
CCWG to forward recommendation to the Board even
if less than all of the COs approve of the
recommendation.</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">As long
as we can find ways to reflect that clearly, we
will be carrying out the intent of the Proposal.</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 2, 2016 at
10:43 AM, Seun Ojedeji <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a></a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">Hello Thomas,</p>
<p dir="ltr">If I process this correctly, it
implies approval of the FoI will be done
based on ratification process in the CCWG
charter, which is different from approval of
the whole WS2 package as per the charter.</p>
<p dir="ltr">If that is it, then I will say
it's somewhat closer to what was proposed in
the report (even though the report did not
mention that CO ratification of FoI is based
on the charter).</p>
<span>
<p dir="ltr">Regards<br>
Sent from my LG G4<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos</p>
</span>
<div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 2 May 2016
3:24 p.m., "Thomas Rickert" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net">thomas@rickert.net</a></a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi
all,
<div>Tijani has proposed a solution
at the end of his latest e-mail:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><font color="#002e7a">I
understand that the first
proposal made the approval of
all the chartering organizations
necessary, The modification
should keep the reference to the
ratification of the chartering
organizations and add "as
defined in the CCWG charter“.</font></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Would that be a way forward?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div>Thomas</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>
<div
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;word-wrap:break-word">
<div
style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Am 02.05.2016 um 16:19
schrieb Seun Ojedeji <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a></a>>:</div>
<br>
<div>
<p dir="ltr">Hello Niels,</p>
<p dir="ltr">I think we
may just be playing
around with words here,
definitely you
understand Tijani's
concern ;-). Let me
attempt to spell
out(even though I have
done this before) my
understanding of the
report which I must say
is obvious:</p>
<p dir="ltr">1. The report
clearly used the phrase
"...*including* approval
of chartering
organisations"</p>
<p dir="ltr">2. Equating
that to mean that it's
equivalent to the CO
approval within CCWG may
be out of order because
as per the charter
irrespective of number
of support from CO, the
package goes to board
for approval.</p>
<p dir="ltr">3. The intent
of item 2 above is not
the same thing as item
1; What I understand is
that the FoI as a
critical document it is
needs to be developed
during WS2, approved by
the CO and incoporated
into the WS2 proposal
which is then sent to
COs for approval as a
complete package.</p>
<p dir="ltr">That said, i
will again say that if
the goal is to reflect
what was written in the
report then we are out
of order. However we may
just agree that what we
have done is correcting
a *mistake* in the
report through the
bylaw. In that case, we
should present it as
such and not on claims
that the report did not
say approval of CO is
required.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<p dir="ltr">Sent from
my LG G4<br>
Kindly excuse brevity
and typos</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On
2 May 2016 9:40 a.m.,
"Niels ten Oever" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net">lists@nielstenoever.net</a></a>>
wrote:<br
type="attribution">
<blockquote
class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi
Tijani,<br>
<br>
But the chartering
organizations are
mentioned in the
charter of the<br>
CCWG, so am not sure
if I understand your
concern.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Niels<br>
<br>
On 05/02/2016 10:22
AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA
wrote:<br>
> Hi Niels,<br>
><br>
> The last
modification of the
bylaws proposed by the
lawyers didn’t make<br>
> any reference to
the chartering
organizations approval
while it is<br>
> clearly mentioned
in the CCWG last
proposal ratified by
the chartering<br>
> organizations.<br>
><br>
> Have a nice day<br>
><br>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> *Tijani BEN
JEMAA*<br>
> Executive
Director<br>
> Mediterranean
Federation of Internet
Associations (*FMAI*)<br>
> Phone: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B216%2098%20330%20114" value="+21698330114" target="_blank">+216
98 330 114</a><br>
> <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%2B216%2052%20385%20114"
value="+21652385114"
target="_blank">+216
52 385 114</a><br>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
><br>
>> Le 2 mai 2016
ŕ 09:11, Niels ten
Oever <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net">lists@nielstenoever.net</a></a><br>
>> <mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net">lists@nielstenoever.net</a></a>>>
a écrit :<br>
>><br>
>> Dear Tijani
and Kavouss,<br>
>><br>
>> Could you
please indicate where
the proposed text is
not consistent with<br>
>> the report?
Concrete references
would be helpful for
me to better<br>
>> understand
your point.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks in
advance,<br>
>><br>
>> Niels<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 05/02/2016
09:38 AM, Kavouss
Arasteh wrote:<br>
>>> Tijani +1<br>
>>> I fully
agree with Tijani<br>
>>> People
misuse the opportunity
to make modifications
that were not agreed<br>
>>> during
the lkast 16 months<br>
>>> NO CHANGE
NO MODIFICATIONS.<br>
>>> During
the WSIS I WILL tell
everybody that there
is no supervision nor<br>
>>> control
on what we have agreed
and the people will
make whatever change<br>
>>> they wish
without the agreements
of the others<br>
>>><br>
>>> KAVOUSS<br>
>>><br>
>>>
2016-05-02 8:14
GMT+02:00 Tijani BEN
JEMAA <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn">tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn</a></a><br>
>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn">tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn</a></a>><br>
>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn">tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn</a></a>>>:<br>
>>><br>
>>>
Mathieu and all,<br>
>>><br>
>>> The
modification proposed
doesn’t reflect the
CCWG last proposal<br>
>>>
approved by the
chartering
organization. I don’t
think we are<br>
>>>
allowed to write
bylaws that are not
the exact
interpretation of the<br>
>>>
approved document that
had the CCWG consensus
and the charting<br>
>>>
organizations
ratification.<br>
>>><br>
>>>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>>
*Tijani BEN JEMAA*<br>
>>>
Executive Director<br>
>>>
Mediterranean
Federation of Internet
Associations (*FMAI*)<br>
>>> Phone:
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B216%2098%20330%20114" value="+21698330114" target="_blank">+216
98 330 114</a><br>
>>>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B216%2052%20385%20114" value="+21652385114" target="_blank">+216
52 385 114</a><br>
>>>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>> Le
2 mai 2016 ŕ 04:23,
Kavouss Arasteh <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a></a><br>
>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a></a>><br>
>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a></a>>>
a écrit :<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
Mathieu,<br>
>>>>
Tks<br>
>>>>
Pls NOTE MY SERIOUS
OBJECTIONS to:<br>
>>>>
1.NOT MENTIONING
REFERNCE TO THE
APPROVAL OF CHARTERING<br>
>>>>
ORGANIZATIONBS in HR<br>
>>>> 2.
GIVE GIVE A BLANKET
AGREEMENT TO THE
DOCUMENTS WHICH YET TO
BE<br>
>>>>
DRAFTED.<br>
>>>> 3.
Making so many changes
to the Third proposals
. We must avoid<br>
>>>>
having a new proposal<br>
>>>>
Kavouss<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
2016-05-01 22:42
GMT+02:00 Mathieu
Weill <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a></a><br>
>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a></a>><br>
>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a></a>>>:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
Dear colleagues,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
Please find below
for your consideration
some suggestions from<br>
>>>>
our lawyers for
clarification of the
bylaw language
regarding<br>
>>>>
the Human rights
FoI. This follows our
request during the<br>
>>>>
previous call.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
Best,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
Mathieu Weill<br>
>>>>
---------------<br>
>>>>
Depuis mon mobile,
désolé pour le style<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
Début du message
transféré :<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>
*Expéditeur:*
"Gregory, Holly" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a></a>>><br>
>>>>>
*Date:* 1 mai
2016 19:10:53 UTC+2<br>
>>>>>
*Destinataire:*
"'Mathieu Weill'" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a></a>>>,
"'Thomas Rickert'"<br>
>>>>>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net">thomas@rickert.net</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net">thomas@rickert.net</a></a>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net">thomas@rickert.net</a></a>>>,
León Felipe<br>
>>>>>
Sánchez Ambía
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a></a>>>,
"<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org">bylaws-coord@icann.org</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org">bylaws-coord@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org">bylaws-coord@icann.org</a></a>>"
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org">bylaws-coord@icann.org</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org">bylaws-coord@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bylaws-coord@icann.org">bylaws-coord@icann.org</a></a>>><br>
>>>>>
*Cc:* ACCT-Staff
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:acct-staff@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:acct-staff@icann.org">acct-staff@icann.org</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:acct-staff@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:acct-staff@icann.org">acct-staff@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:acct-staff@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:acct-staff@icann.org">acct-staff@icann.org</a></a>>>,
"Rosemary E. Fei"<br>
>>>>>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:rfei@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rfei@adlercolvin.com">rfei@adlercolvin.com</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:rfei@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rfei@adlercolvin.com">rfei@adlercolvin.com</a></a>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:rfei@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rfei@adlercolvin.com">rfei@adlercolvin.com</a></a>>>,<br>
>>>>>
"<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com">ICANN@adlercolvin.com</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com">ICANN@adlercolvin.com</a></a>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com">ICANN@adlercolvin.com</a></a>>"<br>
>>>>>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com">ICANN@adlercolvin.com</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com">ICANN@adlercolvin.com</a></a>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com">ICANN@adlercolvin.com</a></a>>>,<br>
>>>>>
Sidley ICANN
CCWG <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com">sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com">sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com">sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com</a></a>>>,<br>
>>>>>
"<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a></a>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a></a>>"<br>
>>>>>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a></a>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a></a>>><br>
>>>>>
*Objet:* *Human
Rights Transition
Provision: Bylaws
Section<br>
>>>>>
27.3(a)*<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
Dear Co-Chairs
and Bylaws
Coordinating Group:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
On the CCWG call
last week, there was a
discussion of the<br>
>>>>>
Bylaws language
regarding the
transition provision
on Human<br>
>>>>>
Rights*//*[27.3(a)]
and it was suggested
that the language be<br>
>>>>>
clarified to
ensure that the same
approval process used
for<br>
>>>>>
Work Stream 1
would apply. We
propose the following<br>
>>>>>
clarifying
edits. We suggest
that you share this
with the<br>
>>>>>
CCWG and if
there is agreement,
the following proposed
edit<br>
>>>>>
should be
included in the CCWG’s
public comment:____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
Redline:____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
*Section 27.3.
HUMAN RIGHTS____*<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
__ __<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
(a) The Core
Value set forth in
Section 1.2(b)(viii)
shall<br>
>>>>>
have no force or
effect unless and
until a framework of<br>
>>>>>
interpretation
for human rights
(“*FOI-HR*”) is
approved by<br>
>>>>>
(i) approved for
submission to the
Board by the<br>
>>>>>
CCWG-Accountability as
a consensus
recommendation in Work<br>
>>>>>
Stream 2, and
(ii) approved by each
of the<br>
>>>>>
CCWG-Accountability’s
chartering
organizations and
(iii) the<br>
>>>>>
Board, (in each
thecase of the Board,
using the same process<br>
>>>>>
and criteria
used by the Boardto
consider the as for
Work<br>
>>>>>
Stream 1
Recommendations).____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
__ __<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
(b) No person or
entity shall be
entitled to invoke the<br>
>>>>>
reconsideration
process provided in
Section 4.2, or the<br>
>>>>>
independent
review process
provided in Section
4.3, based<br>
>>>>>
solely on the
inclusion of the Core
Value set forth in<br>
>>>>>
Section
1.2(b)(viii) (i) until
after the FOI-HR
contemplated<br>
>>>>>
by Section
27.3(a) is in place or
(ii) for actions of
ICANN<br>
>>>>>
or the Board
that occurred prior to
the____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
effectiveness of
the FOI-HR.____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
Clean:____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
*Section 27.3.
HUMAN RIGHTS____*<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
__ __<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
(a) The Core
Value set forth in
Section 1.2(b)(viii)
shall<br>
>>>>>
have no force or
effect unless and
until a framework of<br>
>>>>>
interpretation
for human rights
(“*FOI-HR*”) is (i)
approved<br>
>>>>>
for submission
to the Board by the
CCWG-Accountability as
a<br>
>>>>>
consensus
recommendation in Work
Stream 2 and (ii)
approved<br>
>>>>>
by the Board, in
each case, using the
same process and<br>
>>>>>
criteria as for
Work Stream 1
Recommendations.____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
__ __<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
(b) No person or
entity shall be
entitled to invoke the<br>
>>>>>
reconsideration
process provided in
Section 4.2, or the<br>
>>>>>
independent
review process
provided in Section
4.3, based<br>
>>>>>
solely on the
inclusion of the Core
Value set forth in<br>
>>>>>
Section
1.2(b)(viii) (i) until
after the FOI-HR
contemplated<br>
>>>>>
by Section
27.3(a) is in place or
(ii) for actions of
ICANN<br>
>>>>>
or the Board
that occurred prior to
the____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
effectiveness of
the FOI-HR.____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
Kind regards,
____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
__ __<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
Holly and
Rosemary____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
__ __<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
__ __<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
*HOLLY* *J.
GREGORY*<br>
>>>>>
Partner and
Co-Chair<br>
>>>>>
Corporate
Governance &
Executive Compensation
Practice Group____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
*Sidley Austin
LLP*<br>
>>>>>
787 Seventh
Avenue<br>
>>>>>
New York, NY
10019<br>
>>>>>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B1%20212%20839%205853" value="+12128395853" target="_blank">+1
212 839 5853</a><br>
>>>>>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a></a>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com">holly.gregory@sidley.com</a></a>><br>
>>>>>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.sidley.com">www.sidley.com</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.sidley.com/">http://www.sidley.com/</a></a>>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.sidley.com/">http://www.sidley.com/</a></a>>____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png"
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png">http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png</a></a><br>
>>>>>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.sidley.com/">http://www.sidley.com/</a></a>>
*SIDLEY AUSTIN
LLP*____<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
__ __<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
****************************************************************************************************<br>
>>>>>
This e-mail is
sent by a law firm and
may contain
information<br>
>>>>>
that is
privileged or
confidential.<br>
>>>>>
If you are not
the intended
recipient, please
delete the<br>
>>>>>
e-mail and any
attachments and notify
us<br>
>>>>>
immediately.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>
****************************************************************************************************<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a><br>
>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>>>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a><br>
>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a><br>
>>>
<mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></a><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Niels ten
Oever<br>
>> Head of
Digital<br>
>><br>
>> Article 19<br>
>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.article19.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.article19.org">www.article19.org</a></a>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.article19.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.article19.org/">http://www.article19.org/</a></a>><br>
>><br>
>> PGP
fingerprint 8D9F
C567 BEE4 A431 56C4<br>
>>
678B 08B5 A0F2
636D 68E9<br>
>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a><br>
>> <mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a>><br>
>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></a><br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
Niels ten Oever<br>
Head of Digital<br>
<br>
Article 19<br>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.article19.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.article19.org">www.article19.org</a></a><br>
<br>
PGP fingerprint
8D9F C567 BEE4 A431
56C4<br>
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D
68E9<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></a><br>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org"
target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>