<html>
<body>
At 03/08/2016 04:14 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On 2 Aug 2016 5:57 p.m.,
"Karen Mulberry"
<<a href="mailto:karen.mulberry@icann.org">karen.mulberry@icann.org</a>
> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> NOTE: In evaluating the applications for travel funding the
Co-Chairs will consider applicant's attendance to CCWG meetings and their
contributions to the ongoing work.<br>
><br>
> <br>
SO: I encourage Co-Chairs to be very careful with this one. A member what
it is and evaluation should be based on that; it should remain within the
scope of respective appointing SO/AC to determine if such a member is
performing or not.</blockquote><br>
Careful, certainly, but this must be a criteria for exceptional travel
funding by the CCWG. <br><br>
We are in a new world where the CCWG will be allocated a finite (and
modest) amount of travel funding. If that budget is exceeded or to
justify next year's funding if we are still running, we will have to
demonstrate that we are using the funds effectively. As the Chair one of
the chartering organizations I expect no less.<br><br>
Alan</body>
</html>