<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Xavier </div><div>I have sent you the following question to which I have not received any reply</div><div>Perhaps you have been very busy and overlooked my questions</div><div>I still awaiting for clarifications</div><div>Regards</div><div>KAVOUSS </div><div>Copy of questions raised many weeks ago</div><div>Dear Xavier</div><div>Thank you for all info.</div><div>Pls clarify the following</div><div>1.What is prfessional advice :;this advice is given to whom ,on what subject and why is needed</div><div>2. what is lobbing here. who lobbies for whom and on what and the need for such lobbies</div><div>3 Who checks and confirm the legal costs by three legal entities, who decide that there was a need for such legal advice and who checks and control ther tme spent..Many of these advice were repeatation of previous adfvices and just cut and p[aste from one advice to others .Please review all advices given from the begining of 2015 till now</div><div>We neeed all these detailed info .</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-15 16:25 GMT+02:00 avri doria <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avri@apc.org" target="_blank">avri@apc.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><br>
<br>
On 15-Aug-16 06:43, parminder wrote:<br>
> I just said that an Antigua based betting company will be ill-advised<br>
> to try to take up a closed gTLD in its name and conduct its business<br>
> under it, because it is liable to be seized whenever US authorities<br>
> want to do so (by their jurisdiction control over ICANN) . Same is<br>
> true of a drug company, say from India, planning global e-com trade of<br>
> generic drugs. It will also be ill-advised to risk a closed gTLD in<br>
> its name to do such global business, for the same reason.<br>
<br>
</span>I thought that this has to do with the jurisdiction of the registry and<br>
the rregistrar itself. And while it may cause concern because there are<br>
not as many registries and registrars in non US jurisdictions, there are<br>
some and could be more in time. It may also mean that greater efforts<br>
should be taken to inform people of the jurisdiction their registration<br>
is under and whose laws they are subject to, but I do not see how the<br>
location of ICANN main office or place of incorproation affects this issue.<br>
<br>
In any case aren't the issues relatiing to the jurisdiction of<br>
registries and registrars among the ones being discussed in the Juris<br>
sub group?<br>
<br>
But the conversation has been quite far ranging so could well be missing<br>
the point of the disagreement.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.avast.com/<wbr>antivirus</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-<wbr>Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/accountability-cross-<wbr>community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>