<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>Andrew is perfectly correct and so, in a way, are you, Nigel. &nbsp;I would agree that it is not *normally* for ICANN to run a TLD, but .int is an unusual TLD.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">I think that the current contract includes .int as one of the IANA functions. &nbsp;In preparing the CWG proposal we agreed that any change (or hiving off of .int) needed to follow due process and any action to change this should be
 decided post transition. &nbsp;Few saw it as a priority and most recognised that there was little agreement for dealing with this as part of the transition.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">I would note that .int is seen by many as a highly political registry: &nbsp;making a decision will not be easy.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">And I don't see your poacher-gamekeeper argument. &nbsp;Given ICANN has been managing the domain against a policy defined elsewhere (an RFC) for many years, are there examples of their management of the TLD that have affected their decisions
 on other of the IANA functions or vice-versa?<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Martin Boyle<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;"><br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Sent from my iPhone</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><img width="165" height="23" id="_x0030_6171EF1-7BF4-4B97-951F-DE331471A8A8" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D105C8.15DEB510" alt="cid:image001.jpg@01D0FCF7.DEE0F1F0"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;"><font color="#000000"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><a href="http://nominet.uk/"><b>nominet.uk</b></a><b>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</b>DD:&nbsp;<a href="tel:&#43;44%20(0)1865%20332251" x-apple-data-detectors="true" x-apple-data-detectors-type="telephone" x-apple-data-detectors-result="2">&#43;44
 (0)1865 332251</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Minerva House, Edmund Halley Road, Oxford, OX4 4DQ, United Kingdom</span></p>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
On 14 Sep 2016, at 16:13, Nigel Roberts &lt;<a href="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net">nigel@channelisles.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>I couldn't disagree more.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>In its role as IANA it should be not be both poacher and gamekeeper.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Yet in its role as IANA *AND* the regsitry operator of .INT that is what it does.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>It needs to divest itself of running a registry.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>On 14/09/16 14:50, Andrew Sullivan wrote:</span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:14:40PM &#43;0100, Nigel Roberts wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>And ICANN should not run a registry either. (It does.)</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Actually, in its job as IANA, ICANN's whole job is to run registries.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Of course, that's supposed to go to PTI once this is over, but it's</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>not true that today ICANN &quot;should not&quot; run a registry.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>A</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>