<div dir="ltr"><div>Grec,</div><div>I could agree with the following</div><div><br></div><div>Q1</div><div>Has <font color="#333333" size="3">your ability to use domain name-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction in any way?</font></div><div><font color="#333333" size="3">Q2</font></div><div><font color="#333333" size="3">can go as drafted </font></div><div><font color="#333333" size="3">Q3</font></div><div><font color="#333333" size="3">totally to be deleted </font></div><div><font color="#333333" size="3"><span>Q4</span></font></div><div>I could agree with Phil Corwin edits but deleting the the following text <font color="#333333" size="3"><font color="#ff0000">particularly with regard to the actual operation of ICANN’s policies and accountability mechanisms?</font></font></div><div><font color="#333333"><br></font></div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-12-20 16:33 GMT+01:00 MSSI Secretariat <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mssi-secretariat@icann.org" target="_blank">mssi-secretariat@icann.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" vlink="#954F72" link="#0563C1" bgcolor="white">
<div class="m_-3599850999150344567WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">Hello all,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">The notes, recordings and transcripts for CCWG Accountability WS2
<b>Jurisdiction Subgroup Meeting #14</b> – 19 December 2016 will be available here:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/ZpTDAw" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/x/<wbr>ZpTDAw</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">A copy of the notes may be found below. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">Thank you.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">With kind regards,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">Brenda Brewer <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">MSSI Projects & Operations Assistant<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div style="border-width:medium medium 1.5pt;border-style:none none solid;border-color:currentColor currentColor windowtext;padding:0in 0in 1pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="padding:0in;border:currentColor"><span style="font-size:11pt">ICANN<b>
</b>-<b> </b>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:22.5pt"><b><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial">Notes (including relevant parts of chat):<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><b><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">1. Welcome</span></b><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: No changes to SOIs.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><b><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">2. Questionnaire</span></b><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> a. Results of First Reading at CCWG Plenary<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> b. Potential Edits to Preamble and Questions<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: Unfortunate Parminder is not on call. He had asked for an annex to the preamble to be the full Annex 12.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: Not in favour of modifying preamble. Propose we simplify vs expand the preamble. Propose we delete everything after
the second paragraph.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">avri doria: whereas i see people narrowing the range of facts to suit their hoped for outcome. but the answers take time. better we
have people willing to understand the issue to answer than those who have no time.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Jorge Cancio (GAC Switzerland) 2: We can simplify and include a link to the relevant part of Annex 12<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: People need to understand the questions, Avri<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">avri doria: inclusion of 12 by reference is ok.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: And some of them won't even read the questions if they have to wade through a bunch of procedural gobbledegook<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: Have no problem with shortened preamble - but simply add hyperlink to Annex 12.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: So the proposal is to take the first two paras, add the link and then fix the last para.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Jorge Cancio (GAC Switzerland) 2: Makes sense, what Greg just summarized<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">avri doria: it is less than a page, that is not long.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">David McAuley: As the drafter of the preamble not unsympathetic to shortening.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">avri doria: take out the 12 text and it is a quarter of a page.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: Right Greg<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">David McAuley (RySG): OK<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: cut Further Background and Specifically it would be short - do we need TO HELP? I think the last para is useful.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: Last para needs to stay.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">avri doria: do not remove that para. please<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): agree on last paragraph - go with those edits Greg<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Avri Doria: SPECIFICALLY para is important.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: really need to condense the first three paras. any objections? (none). Let us move on to the first question.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: Propose to delete Business and Privacy and as JN proposed in the plenary remove RELATED SERVICES.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: Any comments? (none)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: Proposal Have your activities related to domain name services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction in any way?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: domain name system or servicees? Willing to be corrected.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">David McAuley (RySG): DNS sounds better, I think there are more DN services than ICANN deals with<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Jeff Neuman: DNS may "sound" better, but 99% of the services are not related to ICANN<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Muller: We can qualify DNS later. We are interested in any effect of ICANN's jurisdiction on DN Services - you cannot buy DNSystem.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: "domain name-related services"? to avoid confusion with managed DNS services etc.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh 2: what is DNS services pls?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: domain name-related services is ok with me<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): agree<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Christopher Wilkinson: support keeping Business and Privacy in question 1.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: Services/Systems is used in other for a – could solve the problem here?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">David McAuley: Need to focus it on ICANN related services etc. could be fixed in intro.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: other comments? (none) 1 for changing, 1 against...any further comments. Temperature check 3 and 3 so no consensus.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: I am against changing it<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh 2: then other people would be against what was in the initial text. Those who have drafted the text should not radically
acts again any comments<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: new temperature check<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh 2: I object to the initial text<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: will republish the first question to the list. Second question (no comment). third question, comments? (none).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">David McAuley (RySG): 2 seems ok<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: Question 4. Much discussion on the list regarding this.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Jorge Cancio (GAC Switzerland) 2: Q4 as proposed by Phil Corwin: "4. What are the advantages or disadvantages, if any, relating to
ICANN's jurisdiction*, particularly with regard to the actual operation of ICANN’s policies and accountability mechanisms? Please support your response with appropriate examples, references to specific laws, case studies, other studies, and analysis. In particular,
please indicate if there are current or past instances that highlight such advantages or problems."<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">avri doria: looks good<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Philip Corwin 2: +1 to Jorge's suggestion ;-)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Jorge Cancio (GAC Switzerland) 2: +1 to Phil :D<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: issue with Q3.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: Q3 was added to allow people to submit other people/business/countries experiences if documented.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh 2: I am not convinced by Q3 objectives<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">avri doria: we are worried about people answering one questionnaire. Now we want to send them two?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: Q1: Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase domain name-related services been affected by ICANN's
jurisdiction in any way?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: This would be sent with a note of Kavouss's alternate suggestion.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: I am opposed to Q4 in this questionnaire - could be sent independently later (Explaining rationale for this)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: not convinced on question 3. Worried it has not meaning.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: needs to be verifiable.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arateh: do not agree.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Erich Schweighofer: Q3 is a research question - can be helpful, most will ignore it.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">David McAuley (RySG): I agree with kavouss in this respect - the responder can simply say that the report is verifiable.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Paul McGrady 2: I tend to agree with Kavouss. Q3 has little real value since it is just gathering hears<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Avri Doria: Support Q3 for secondary sources. Requires more work in analysis but still very useful.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">David McAuley (RySG): Avri raises an interesting point - who will do the work of verification?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Wale Bakare: Q3 is about data collection, so that poses a bit of challenge.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: those with multiple personalities get multiple speaking opportunities<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: still do not support Q3 - cannot get comments from experiences who are not your own.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Christopher Wilkinson: Understand the concern about Q3 vs validation. But still could be useful. Would prefer not to have hearsay.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: Need to focus Q3 to get valid information.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Paul McGrady 2: We would also need a mechanism to toss out responses that don't fit though.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Wale Bakare: IMHO, we have many registered ALSs, where factual data could be sourced from as well.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: of course, Paul, if someone does not provide actual reports or information we toss it out.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Avri Doria: needs to be there. This could be the factual basis to lead to other discussions.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Mueller: we are not going to get any concrete information with Q4<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Jorge Cancio (GAC Switzerland) 2: agree with Avri... as said before Phil Corwin's formulation could work<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">(many people leaving for other call)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh: need Q4 but can be re-edited.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: KA are you ok with PC edits.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Erich Schweighofer: I support the revised version.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">David McAuley (RySG): I don’t support Q4. But if that ship sails I prefer Phil Corwin version - again, only if we insist on Q4.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Milton Meuller: Q4 should be reformulated and not sent at the same time - but if we have to send it the PC version is ok.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Jorge Cancio (GAC Switzerland) 2: Let's go with Phill's version if everyone can live with this<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Kavouss Arasteh 3: I do not agreee David with that version<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">Greg Shatan: I will put these options out on the list. Adjourned<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> c. Question 4<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> i. Can this question be revised to get broader support?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> ii. Should this question be sent separately? <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> d. Preparing for Second Reading at CCWG<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> Plenary<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">3. Mechanics and details of the questionnaire process<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> a. How to publish/send out questionnaire<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt"> b. How to collect responses<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">4. Review of Work to Date and Potential Next Steps<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">5. AOB<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white;margin-top:7.5pt"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt">6. Adjourn<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-<wbr>Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/accountability-cross-<wbr>community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>